I can come up with some potential downsides:I'm curious what people see as the downside of alphanumeric combinations. Note that the example given isn't the only way to do it. Tenka suggested using consecutive numbers with a single letter so G1-G6 for example. (I chose G for gaming, but most other letters would do except for F, L or R)Actually all options have problems -- see the first post and the thread it refers to. They all have different problems, but there is not a single choice that has no downsides at all.
- Neelix
- two characters per button instead of one character/symbol, some would consider that to be more complicated / less elegant
- someone might think that e.g. G2 means "first press G, then press 2"
- mentally they might be confused with the number keys or the F-keys
- not backwards compatible with Pandora
- does not correspond to any emulated system
- there is no single "natural" ordering of the keys (in such a button layout, which one is the "fifth" button?)
- the labels don't have a "personality", it's a bit "boring"
- the labels don't have a natural associated semantics, if I need buttons for YES, NO, MENU, SHOOT etc there is no way the button label can be associated with those actions
I'm not saying that those are important downsides or that I assign a big weight to them, but it looks like some people do. I personally voted alphanumerical labels to be "acceptable", but not "preferable".