skeezix
Internal Development
okay, posting PMs, even as vicious as that one, is a little low class. It illustrates why I'm done with Craig,
but I'll pull it.
jeff
but I'll pull it.
jeff
This is the stuff we have to deal with.
I'm one of the Pandora parents in a small way, and I'm not giving up on the Pandora community. But I'm done with Craig.
Craig, since the iControlpad runs so well, why don't you use this "clockwork" to pay ED, deliver to your customers and then pop out of the pandora history?
You constantly keep on pissing of the people who put their free time into this project, you take money _again_ without being able to deliver, you hold competitions without delivering prices, you have 2 future projects you focus on with 3 year old preorders of your previous project unfulfilled, yet when somebody constructivly suggest you better prepare to the case someone asks you about this, you get at him, knive in hand. And it happens again and again and again.
Bets it will happen again, if people start complaining when you don't deliver iCP2s in November because of [insert random company here]?
I'm sorry, I don't see how torpor's comments are offensive...
All I see is a (very good) suggestion to be ready to explain the situation if and when it comes up.
torporification? Whats that, exactly?
Anyway, craig, the position stands: you must be prepared for the worst. Yes, there is some suspicion of you as a character, and yes, you must account for this fact, because it is a stigma of involvement in this community: "Craig, you either love him or hate him", and well .. in both angles, there can be good and bad reasons for loving or hating you, Craig. The press, getting wind of your successes, may well be inclined to sell your story on the basis of its controversies, which do exist. Now there seems to be trouble brewing vis a vis your relationship with Open Pandora GmBH, which is a terrible travesty if half the rumors prove to be true, indeed, since your very survival depends on that relationship with ED being, paramount, squeaky, squeaky clean. Not having paid him for digging you out of disaster is definitely *not* the way to demonstrate business prowess on the order of responsibilities of hundreds of thousands of dollars ..
As for the feedback loop, wherein you instantly castigate anyone with an inkling of criticism of your practices, please be aware: I have supported you since the days you were selling GP32's one by one, I have Pandora and Wiz and GP2X coming out of the drawers because of my willingness to support your ideal of a hardware startup, and well: if you think I'm out to get you, you're not only criminally ignorant, but probably also insane. I was one of the very first actual cash-donor's in line for a lot of your projects so far, and it is a dismal fact for me to have to say "watch out for the negative products of your conduct" because I, in fact, am a positive: I have my Pandoras, love them, use them a lot. Same with my iCP's (x2) and my future iCP2's, no doubt ..
Beware, there *is* a story being written here, Craig. Your authorship is, indeed, the subject.
And you still did not punished them in any way, which is imho the main problem onto the entire situation. At the Moment, the Useres have to pay for all the mess of the Pandora troubles, CC (and otheres) made. This is not only unfair but actualy the completely wrong way to deal with this. It's like EU finance crisis, the poor People have to pay for the mistakes of Banks and speculations of the Finance Industry and these that caused all the mess are still laughing and still doing their bad stuff (I mean CC, not the OP-Team).The very simple facts are, I paid CircuitCo to do a job, and they didn't do it, and we were left in the shit.