comradekingu
Glowing ember
When you type on a desk, you can reach half the keyboard that the shift is on, with the hand that is typing shift...
Let me break it down:
When you have shift on the right side, which is the only side enter and , . can also be on, even on a reduced English layout, your left hand is free to start a sentence with ENTC, which are the most used english starters.
They are all on the left. Not only is enter dot and comma on the right the standard, it makes sense. We also imply for the most part, the user is right handed, and has the best command of his right thumb.
Therefore it makes sense to fully end a sentence with your right, and then be free on the left to start a sentence with your left. But it works out even if the sentence begins on the right. Here is why:
Also adding a shift to the left means you get a little better access to starting sentences with letters that are on the right, like MLK or a J, because thats where your right hand is, however, to achieve this, you must
To improve efficiency, add a shift on the shoulder, that way you are free after typing enter, to move your right thumb inwards _and_ your left is unencumbered.
The reason why left shift made a little sense, is therefore the same reason shoulder-shift is a lot better. Even for the short term picture of just being able to start a sentence with a letter on the right.
Longer term with left shift the left hand doesn't start at a defect when typing letter two in the sentence, after the capitalized one. To start your sentence with the letter on the right, your left hand had to be on left shift as your right was typing for example O. Which means you are still tied up, even if having two shifts.
So for less than half the time, leftshift as opposed to only right, has the advantage of tying up your left hand at either right side, or full left. Marginal. Starting a sentence with an A is the exception here, because its a case where 10-finger logic can be applied, in that you are able to reach the a with the same 'hand' you typed shift with. It is however a little hack, in what could be a better system, and also one where the beginner starts out not having to learn tricks.
Something it appears someone has forgotten, even with the most efficiency at both, is that its a lot easier for a beginner to fully end a sentence with the right every time, and then reach over with the left hand to the right side. Same muscle memory, same logic every time.
You can learn to start this motion as your right is busy with dot-enter-shift to take away the downtime left hand has in going to the right hand side. Which is the same as learning to seek shift with the left, only much easier.
Because the user knows where the letters are, the user doesnt magically pick up which shift is easier to use for which side. Keep it simple, dont learn habits that only serve as a workaround of making a system usable. And please, dont excuse a bad system with the possibility of learning caveats, hacks and workarounds. If it can be explained easily, it is simple, and it works.
So to sum it up, if you get more advanced than right shift only, shoulder-shift is it every time.
The only thing left to argue is, 'but i shift attention after typing enter to type dot on the other side and/or also do the same for dot comma. It wouldn't make much of a difference'
Answer: The basis of your argument is a fundamentally broken layout, for fundamental reasons of why a working keyboard is effective.
Edit: Ok, to make an example, pretend tab is dot, and FN is shift on your pandora. A little triangle dot-enter-shift.
Even a beginner can type that, _and_ begin their sentence, (even if it starts on the right,) faster than a seasoned pandora-pro can slalom back and forth.
Let me break it down:
When you have shift on the right side, which is the only side enter and , . can also be on, even on a reduced English layout, your left hand is free to start a sentence with ENTC, which are the most used english starters.
They are all on the left. Not only is enter dot and comma on the right the standard, it makes sense. We also imply for the most part, the user is right handed, and has the best command of his right thumb.
Therefore it makes sense to fully end a sentence with your right, and then be free on the left to start a sentence with your left. But it works out even if the sentence begins on the right. Here is why:
Also adding a shift to the left means you get a little better access to starting sentences with letters that are on the right, like MLK or a J, because thats where your right hand is, however, to achieve this, you must
- move focal attention (you ended the sentence on your right, because that's where the enter was)
- shift motoric attention (you ended with your right hand)
- drift position of left hand out of center (because on letter two, your left hand is still at left shift, qwerty having a and e on the left doesnt make this better)
To improve efficiency, add a shift on the shoulder, that way you are free after typing enter, to move your right thumb inwards _and_ your left is unencumbered.
The reason why left shift made a little sense, is therefore the same reason shoulder-shift is a lot better. Even for the short term picture of just being able to start a sentence with a letter on the right.
Longer term with left shift the left hand doesn't start at a defect when typing letter two in the sentence, after the capitalized one. To start your sentence with the letter on the right, your left hand had to be on left shift as your right was typing for example O. Which means you are still tied up, even if having two shifts.
So for less than half the time, leftshift as opposed to only right, has the advantage of tying up your left hand at either right side, or full left. Marginal. Starting a sentence with an A is the exception here, because its a case where 10-finger logic can be applied, in that you are able to reach the a with the same 'hand' you typed shift with. It is however a little hack, in what could be a better system, and also one where the beginner starts out not having to learn tricks.
Something it appears someone has forgotten, even with the most efficiency at both, is that its a lot easier for a beginner to fully end a sentence with the right every time, and then reach over with the left hand to the right side. Same muscle memory, same logic every time.
You can learn to start this motion as your right is busy with dot-enter-shift to take away the downtime left hand has in going to the right hand side. Which is the same as learning to seek shift with the left, only much easier.
Because the user knows where the letters are, the user doesnt magically pick up which shift is easier to use for which side. Keep it simple, dont learn habits that only serve as a workaround of making a system usable. And please, dont excuse a bad system with the possibility of learning caveats, hacks and workarounds. If it can be explained easily, it is simple, and it works.
So to sum it up, if you get more advanced than right shift only, shoulder-shift is it every time.
The only thing left to argue is, 'but i shift attention after typing enter to type dot on the other side and/or also do the same for dot comma. It wouldn't make much of a difference'
Answer: The basis of your argument is a fundamentally broken layout, for fundamental reasons of why a working keyboard is effective.
Edit: Ok, to make an example, pretend tab is dot, and FN is shift on your pandora. A little triangle dot-enter-shift.
Even a beginner can type that, _and_ begin their sentence, (even if it starts on the right,) faster than a seasoned pandora-pro can slalom back and forth.
Last edited by a moderator: