I wonder if changing the weighting to 0, -1, -2, -3, -4 would solve our rule breaker issue? Most seem to have one favorite rather than one... unfavorite. Voting only for your favorite would get it -10 points
. OTOH, you could give one entry a huge minus and thus unfairly cast your unfavorite option to oblivion. But I think it's a smaller issue than with positive votes
EDIT: also, casting a vote only in the "best" category would have no bearing on the poll at all
Haha, according to that metric, proposal 3 is currently winning with -73, followed by proposal 1 with -75, proposal 4 with -88, proposal 2 with -95 and proposal 5 with -109
_wb_ any chance showing what the numbers are like with the invalid votes removed?
Now even Wally is casting an invalid vote for 5 times proposal 1. Ugh...
Anyway, if the weights are symmetric (+2 to -2), such invalid votes are neutral. Only proposals 1 and 3 have a positive total score with that weighing.
B-ZaR's weighing is a good way to discourage such invalid votes
More seriously, using the Australian preferential voting system, we would currently get the following redistribution:
First choices: 1:24, 2:2, 3:13, 4:4, 5:1.
Distributing votes for losing proposal 5 to their second choices: 1:24, 2:2, 3:14, 4:4
Distributing votes for losing proposal 2 to their second choices: 1:25, 3:15, 4:4
Distributing votes for losing proposal 4 to their second choices: 1:26, 3:18
Winner: proposal 1.
So among the 7 voters who did not put proposal 1 or 3 first, 2 would transfer their vote to proposal 1 and 5 would transfer their vote to proposal 3.
In any case this poll just confirms what we already knew: it's controversial, the two main proposals are proposal 1 and proposal 3, and whichever proposal is picked, some people will be unhappy
Would it be a good compromise to have the Playstation-Greek labels as main labels, with small-print sub-labels "Home/A", "End/B", "PgUp/Y" and "PgDn/X" (actually the "/X" is probably not needed because Chi looks enough like an X -- but we could keep it anyway for consistency)?
That way we have backwards compatibility, and if you don't know the Greek letter and can't describe its shape (and color?), you can refer to it by its Pandora name. But we also have nice-looking labels that don't look like a completely random mess, and there is a nicely unambiguous way to refer to the action buttons without causing potential confusion with the keyboard keys.