On a more positive note, I suspect I might have early dementia, which is cool because I’m on Invega, which can instakill people with dementia. Honestly, having a drug that instakills people with dementia sounds like a service to me. They should give it to the entire population as sort of a screening tool.
Ah, but here is the problem with cutting off a segment of people: They might have good DNA that other groups do not have. DNA that might be key to our survival.
nb: did not check if these are all genetic tendencies and not food/cultural.
So you might have intelligent people with defects that cause, say, spina-bifida (open spine disease), and resistance to teflon and other toxins that cause cancer. So low cancer rates and say, not prone to being fat. Or Long, and have joint problems in later life (caused by being long but not having the gene to have extra cartilage). Long life but prone to fits and rage due to genetics (good for war situations bad at peaceful times because you can not channel that rage). So how are you going to index and wage those pro and cons?
We all carry around 50 DNA errors out of a pool of 200 (somewhat a
source). But there's also the theory that you need all nutrients to stay healthy, and those are not available in sufficient quantities all over the world (hence the importance of long distance trade and hollidays). The result is that population groups suffer from the same. Extra prone to gall stones if SouthAmerican. Extra prone to obesitas if in north America. Less testosterone levels and keeping your head-hair, but being more androgynous as a population.
If you go back, then you have the more intelligent Neanderthaler v/s the more aggressive Homo Sapiens. Theories do not agree about what exactly happened, but likely we did not intermingle and we ate them.
Then, aside of the mutations, we have
inserted retro-virus code inside our "non-coding" DNA, around 8% of our DNA code is HERVs, but not all population groups have the same
HERVS. We don't know much about what it does there and if does any good or not. All we know is that there are partial sequences, duplicated ones, and full sequences.
So at some point, when fertility starts to drop due to excessive errors (which might be accelerated due to our lifestyle and technology), we will need to manually repair our DNA by rolling back these mutations. Which can only be funded by promising hybridizing our DNA with the
Axolotl (and the promise of eternal life).
But by then, it will be the state that tells you IF you can procreate or not and selects your "best" partner for that.