Trickyhero
Member
Sounds great ED. Hopefully the CPU board goes well, sounds like that is the last big hurdle.
I expect over-testing of the wifi chipAs soon as the prototype is confirmed to be working fine.
Yeah, now that you mention it... What happened with the wifi chip? The planned one had an unreasonably long waiting time, and the new one (probably WL1837MOD?) was quite a bit bigger. Is this already solved in the latest schematics? Sorry I haven't been paying that much attention during the last weeks...I expect over-testing of the wifi chipAs soon as the prototype is confirmed to be working fine.
OK, thanksAs soon as the prototype is confirmed to be working fine.
But why do we use a hard-to-get port which does not only work not the way SATA should, but also eats up a free USB port with the current adaptor design?Nikolaus also started to work on the e-SATA adaptor which plugs into our USB port for those who want to connect a SATA device to the Pyra.
Well originally it was going to be a USB2.0/eSATA combo port which is apparently hard to source now. As for it eating up a free USB port, the thing still would have a free regular size USB port and a USB 3.0 otg port that could be put into host mode. The Pandora only has one regular sized USB port, so it still is better than the Pandora in that regard. You have to realize there isn't enough space to put a dedicated eSATA port on a handheld device.But why do we use a hard-to-get port which does not only work not the way SATA should, but also eats up a free USB port with the current adaptor design?Nikolaus also started to work on the e-SATA adaptor which plugs into our USB port for those who want to connect a SATA device to the Pyra.
As Trashy said: The USB/eSATA-Comboport is not available anymore (out of production).But why do we use a hard-to-get port which does not only work not the way SATA should, but also eats up a free USB port with the current adaptor design?Nikolaus also started to work on the e-SATA adaptor which plugs into our USB port for those who want to connect a SATA device to the Pyra.
Sorry for misunderstanding the fact that we are NOT using the combo.As Trashy said: The USB/eSATA-Comboport is not available anymore (out of production).But why do we use a hard-to-get port which does not only work not the way SATA should, but also eats up a free USB port with the current adaptor design?Nikolaus also started to work on the e-SATA adaptor which plugs into our USB port for those who want to connect a SATA device to the Pyra.
And even if it still existed, once you connected a SATA harddisk, you couldn't plug in a USB device anymore, so there's no difference than using the adaptor.
There certainly is no place for a dedicated port - so our current options are:
1x USB + 1x eSATA
2x USB + SATA over adapter in one USB-Port
As two USB Ports are more useful for most than an eSATA-Port, the last solution is the best one.
IIUC the combo port would have been a real SATA port. The SoC has real SATA capability that is now exposed as an actual SATA port by the adaptor making use of the additional USB 3 lanes (that cannot be driven as USB 3, because the SOC provides only one USB 3 port and that is used for OTG, because it is the only one providing OTG support). Possible future SoC upgrades will probably not have SATA but more USB 3 ports.Sorry for misunderstanding the fact that we are NOT using the combo.As Trashy said: The USB/eSATA-Comboport is not available anymore (out of production).But why do we use a hard-to-get port which does not only work not the way SATA should, but also eats up a free USB port with the current adaptor design?Nikolaus also started to work on the e-SATA adaptor which plugs into our USB port for those who want to connect a SATA device to the Pyra.
And even if it still existed, once you connected a SATA harddisk, you couldn't plug in a USB device anymore, so there's no difference than using the adaptor.
There certainly is no place for a dedicated port - so our current options are:
1x USB + 1x eSATA
2x USB + SATA over adapter in one USB-Port
As two USB Ports are more useful for most than an eSATA-Port, the last solution is the best one.
My main point was that it might be a better idea not to use a SATA connector for something what is far from being a SATA port.
It is a SATA port, driven at SATA speeds. The port is normally a USB2 port, but with the adapter becomes a full eSATA port. In the future, this port can also become a USB3 port but the current SoC doesn't have such support so that will have to wait.My main point was that it might be a better idea not to use a SATA connector for something what is far from being a SATA port.
Nice!