wardred said:
Didn't see any snapping, just responses to my comments.
Excellent - it can be tricky judging "tone" online at the best of times, doubly so when you're low on pain meds, and I got this sudden impression last night that I'd been snippy rathre than grateful.
wardred said:
I haven't messed much with composting, though I kinda get how it works from your explanations - basically merging the two images, or using parts of 1 of the renders in the other. I like the above image of aquarium. I think this latest version melds most the suggestions for it nicely.
There's a whole raft of ways to use it, but if I can use the Dragon 1 image as the easiest example, in THIS animation I'm using 2 versions of the scene - one gloriously dark, one blindingly bright.
The animation shows a few degrees of blend - rather corsely - and here is the blend I've chosen in the hopes it is bright enough for everyone without being too bright for me
Sadly, I got a couple of the aquarium render setups wrong last night, so they need to render again this morning with the RIGHT settings. Fortunately they are in Poser Pro not DS, so they not only have the attention of my quad core PC but also - if they wanted it - a small (though not very powerful) renderfarm. Those two images should be done in a matter of very few hours, while I work on other things - like "All I Want For Christmas!"
wardred said:
No worries on poor jar brain. It works as it is, and you only have so many computing resources to use at one time. If you do get the chance to tweak it, I'd be interested to see the results.
cheers
wardred said:
1 other thought I had on Jar Brain and forgot to mention. Thought control is all of the magazine text you can really see when scaled to fit the table. That can imply either that the jar brain is controlling the Pandora, or that there's something controlling the jar brain. I love the full sized magazine heading just as it is, but you can't see that clearly when it's scaled and lying on the table. Maybe have something in there about telekinesis? Again, that's only if/when you have time, and if it can be done elegantly. If not, it works the way it is.
My 8yo son sat down with me the day I'd done "New Mad Scientist" and, in front of my wife, explained in perfect "art-critic" style exactly what each element of the image meant, and how it impacted the rest of the image. I really wish I'd taped it, now, but hindsight is 20/20. I figure if he can work it out the second he sits in front of it, it's good enough - and of course it's always nice to leave a LITTLE ambiguity (even if I did take that a little too far in Dragon #1) for the viewer to fill in the blanks in their own way. Sure, the artist/author always has what THEY believe the meaning is, but who is to say that they are right?
Breakfast! Drugs!