lot of features I want like:
...
7. EvilDragon
...
EvilDragon doesn't ship with pyra
lot of features I want like:
...
7. EvilDragon
...
But the community does? OMG, I need a bigger appartment... nah, a village!EvilDragon doesn't ship with pyra
But the community does? OMG, I need a bigger appartment... nah, a village!
. It's almost impossible to get good developers these days
From reading the pyra kernel list, it feels like an awfully long time since anyone found anything that required a revision (the last one being the charge limiting resistor, which I recall was found a good few months ago now, just ED didn't have any new prototypes to build back then). Perhaps more eyes will result in a few issues that require new CPU modifications, but I don't anticipate many of them, if any at all. The CPU boards as of now can run pyra os basically idle indefinitely, and have been able to run web browser and things since over a year as I recall.
That's what levi was saying: it's basically done, there's nothing obvious left to integrate: the wifi works, the screen works, the sound works, the RAM works, the SD cards work, the battery charging works, even the cell modem works (just pining for some high quality user interface); everything works. Might discover some issues once units are out in the wild but those are just bugs that need fixing, perfectly normal in an operating system.I think its about getting the os to integrate with the hardware.
Nah, I've noticed it too; he's been negative and sarcastic since post #1. Check it out, post #3 straight up called EvilDragon incompetent. He seemingly joined for no reason other than to complain about the project.Has he been negative about it since he joined last year? His behaviour hasn't stood out to me like that thus far, but I'll be keeping an eye out for it now.
Some Japanese vengeful spirit, you say?Seems like everyone who wants to tackle the issue disappears after some time.
I was under the inpression it was fixed, but only in an older kernel, like 4.9.something.It depends on what you consider fixed... 3D acceleration works, Rotation works... At the same time, not so much. Unless I've missed anything over the past few months. Seems like everyone who wants to tackle the issue disappears after some time.
From what I understand it just needs to be re compiled for a newer kernel, no one has bothered as the underlying issue of it conflicting with the rotation still exists.I was under the inpression it was fixed, but only in an older kernel, like 4.9.something.
Software is currently also my main concern, it will certainly not be polished when we ship. It's almost impossible to get good developers these days.
It won't happen overnight but it should be this year, yes.
^^ that.low level kernal devs
What kind of devs do you mean in particular, low level kernal devs or emulator devs etc?
Nothing better I've seen than AtC's post just above yours.Though I am not a programmer, is there a to-do list somewhere?