So, basically, everyone is back to where they were in 2007 (that's the earliest post I could find on GP32x discussing the "new handheld console"), except they're now listening to those who said "Don't use the cheapest company!" at the time, except for a handful of people who have a device that only a handful of other people have?
CC was not cheap. And it was suggested we use them by TI.
The cheap company was the one in China, and that one did their job.
Even down to seeking investment again? And the paid-preorders turned into too much of a nightmare to repeat (wouldn't be your tax consultant telling you that by any chance)?
I was open for investors and suggested them for years and never really liked the paid preorders idea.
Craig didn't like investors, but he also doesn't want any more paid preorders.
Lucky we didn't use investors right from the start, as we would've run out of money then.
It sounds like 4 years down the pan, to me - and the majority of people who originally ordered, and a significant portions of those who bought "premium" units, still haven't got what was promised multiple times. And in a couple of years time, assuming all goes perfectly from here on in, those units from the first batch will probably still be warned against due to poor production quality. I don't see how that's "looking good".
1300 preordered units left (Batch 1 + Batch 2) versus about 2800 delivered units.
Where is your majority that didn't get it yet?
And I still find the legalities unnecessarily confusing - so there are two companies on opposite sides of the English Channel, owned by two different people, with zero paperwork between them, seeking investment with no clear contract on how owns what or has licensed what to whom or owes what to who, with zero effective stock control (given that people have to fight tooth and nail to find out where their units are, how many are remaining etc.), seeking investment into "something" that has already virtually failed once (and isn't exactly profitable yet), has been sourced out of the similar company that Craig owned into (up to two) separate entities that can individually collapse with little recourse, where the investors would have zero say in anything, for a minimum input of 10,000 EUR, when 4 years ago they were in a BETTER position and only managed to take backwards steps since then. That's not even really "investment" so much as "gambling" (which is vastly different).
You try to sound like a smart-ass without having even seen the business plan, don't you?
I am well aware that no investor would want to invest into any company where it's unclear whether they depend on someone else to even start the production or not and which parts they own.
First, my business plan includes that my company buys the remaining parts from Craigs company so that everything is handled from one company.
It also includes the preorders that still have to be delivered.
It also includes a calculation of how much money is needed for that all and how much profit there is after a certain amount of units have been produced and shipped.
If you haven't found out yourself: The issues we had (LCD cables, Nubs, etc.) have been solved already.
The only real issue left right now is the board company, and that's why we have a new one ready now.
2800 units are out there, some for over a year and still work fine.
It's been proven the product itself works and the users are happy with it.
All that's left is a stable production, development is finished. So with a business plan, it's pretty clear for an investor what he invests in what he can gain from that.
Personally, the farce grows ever on and on, down from the door where it began...
No one forces you to agree with anything that happens here.
However, right now you're talking about stuff without even really knowing anything about the business plan and the approach.
You have no idea what exactly is going on nor did you even understand how many have been delivered and where the problems are.
And then you try to call that a farce. Right.