Polossatik
I reject your reality and substitute my own
cobaltage said:Yarkle said:Thoughts?
you're obviously not very bright.
Friend of CrackerJack?
Last edited by a moderator:
cobaltage said:Yarkle said:Thoughts?
you're obviously not very bright.
Yarkle said:Alright this topic finally got some unbiased replies. No i'm not a troll, I just want to hear everyone opinion about the slow progress of this device that has happened to others in the past and turned into "vaporware" ie never produced/put out for sale/ gave up on.
cobaltage said:The problem with your post is that if you're not just a troll, you're obviously not very bright. I say this for two reasons. First, the idea that you would ask such a question at all is a sign of unintelligence. It is either vaporware (in the sense that, someone tries to produce something, but in the end, the product is never released) or it's a scam. Your question confuses the two issues. If Open Pandora is actively trying to produce something but it never surfaces, then it is vaporware; if they are not and are merely stringing people along with the intention of deceiving them, it is a scam.
Secondly, regardless of which question you mean to ask (although it's clear that you lack the insight to realize that they are two different questions), the idea that you would ask whatever your question actually is to the active posters on the forum of the device that you are asking about is completely moronic.
IMO.
jb0yx said:yadda yadda boobiescrade said:blah blah boobs
Sphinxter said:Chairman_Now said:Restless said:so understand slack must be given to new investors and I do mean investors..
I'm not sure that you understand what the word "investor" means. For one, an "investor" typically expects or hopes for a financial return on their investment, with the possibility of a loss of their investment, too.
This is an example of investors and investment. While there is the similarity of a bunch of people putting small amounts of money in something speculative, as well as the risk of losing these funds. But, unlike a true investment, there is no possibility that pre-orders will share in any profits should the OP project meet with any appreciable success.
So, to make it plain: you are a customer who has allowed a vendor to hold your money without producing the promised product as of yet. Nothing more, nothing less.
Having a fixed rate of return does not make you any less of an investor. To be a customer you have to buy something and you cannot buy what doesn't exist.
declaration said:Well if it isnt vapourware, it should be, because the specs and features announced years ago seemed decent at the time, but the device seems pathetic now compared to the top end smart phones.
No 3g just isnt any good for a mobile device in this day and age imho.
SONY said:Make that 2 Months
Gilrad said:In response to the original question:
I will consider the Pandora vaporware if they start taking batch two preorders without having finished shipping batch one.
Philly said:Hello Yarkle... Welcome, we arent all crazy and defensive here, just most of us, lol.
Mofokubik said:That's easy for you to say.. Mark it 8, dude.
Shame we've been this close for years, and people say "the worst time to ask because so close" for years now also. I find those statements just as funny as the scam ones :lol:traylorpark said:Especially now, when the end seems to be so close, you chose probably the worst time and the worst place to start an 'unbiased' discussion.