FaeMinx
Rainbow Liberation Instigation
Handling the Pyra will be similar to handling the Pandora, and that's something everyone understood.
*cough*
hakmanplayer
*cough*
...
Handling the Pyra will be similar to handling the Pandora, and that's something everyone understood.
foobar2000 only works on x86 Windows, even if the power saving options get implemented, it will not work (or only via emulation which doesn't make a lot of sense for a music program). foobar2000 Mobile could be made to work on the Pyra, but I personally have no idea how good it is and it would still need some porting or an Android compatibility layer, both are not safe to happen. There are however replacement programs like DeadBeef or Audacious for Linux which also work on ARM, these should already be available on Debian with apt-get.2.Let's say I install foobar2000 and play some music. Can I close the pandora down and have it keep playing in my pocket so it goes to my bluetooth headphones but the idle state saves battery?
I'm not entirely sure, but I think us pre-pre-orderers can use the voucher we got by that (your number should be saved at your Dragonbox account) for the normal pre-order, so we don't have to pay anything more at that time and pick our Pyra version, and then pay down the rest when the devices are ready for shipping - you could probably use the ICP2 voucher then.Will it be possible to do a pre-order along with a pre-pre-order and ICP2 voucher? I'm just thinking sort of like a payment plan Or would I end up with 2 Pyras then?
Can we expect a complete list of emulation capabilities? I'm not asking about time, just if it will happen
Currently, that stuff is present in about every android smartphone. Since android is linux-based, maybe it would help looking there
Or is it hardware\software limited?
Should have seen the wait times on the Pandora release... this is nothing.I am so glad I came across the Pandora and Pyra last year. I am already impatient for the Pyra to come out, and I haven't waited anywhere close to the amount of time most on here have.
If it hadn't been for Gruso's news site, I don't think I'd have converted my Craig preorder into an ED order. Hopefully Eki's blog can keep us all updated while we wait, if the forum becomes too much for any of us, combined with ED's twitter feed I guess.Should have seen the wait times on the Pandora release... this is nothing.
....I've been using foobar for 2 years and I thought it was linux based this whole time. Shows just how much I know...foobar2000 only works on x86 Windows, even if the power saving options get implemented, it will not work (or only via emulation which doesn't make a lot of sense for a music program). foobar2000 Mobile could be made to work on the Pyra, but I personally have no idea how good it is and it would still need some porting or an Android compatibility layer, both are not safe to happen. There are however replacement programs like DeadBeef or Audacious for Linux which also work on ARM, these should already be available on Debian with apt-get.
No way to have a list of consoles like on the pandora site? you know, by hardware capability? PSP? DS? 3DS? Dreamcast? Saturn? No? Awwwwww.... *bows down head in shame*No one can do this. Well, you can be sure it can do the same as the Pandora but even more
What makes Foobar2000's FLAC decoder exceptional?I guess I'll just have to hope this Deadbeef has an awesome FLAC decoder.
What properties make Foobar2000 great?Yep, I use foobar since forever, it rocks. Like you, I also thought it had a linux support. Shame.
(Sorry for the short derail, but I'm curious. If this continues more than a couple of posts it should be moved to a separate thread.)
What makes Foobar2000's FLAC decoder exceptional?
What properties make Foobar2000 great?
A. (The real one) It sounds better in my ears than when playing with other media players with the FLAC codec installed. VLC, Winamp, Especially WMP, where it's noticable to anyone, imho.What makes Foobar2000's FLAC decoder exceptional?
What properties make Foobar2000 great?
Exactly, mod, it, neo geo, whatever, it does it all. It is also small and accepts my files as it is structured on disk (I praise my file structure above anything else), no bullshit of auto remapping stuff unless you want.
I have a 24bit 128hz playback card and it takes it wonderfully. There is so much more, anything you may want soundwise is probably available.
Nothing beats it on my books.
edit: not off topic, but a tool this great would just be awesome on pyra on release.
That's odd, as a lossless compression it should decompress into exactly the same bytes that were put in no matter which decoder you used. Maybe there's some extra post-processing in Foobar or unnecessary post-processing in WMP?A. (The real one) It sounds better in my ears than when playing with other media players with the FLAC codec installed. VLC, Winamp, Especially WMP, where it's noticable to anyone, imho.
The major problem with running foobar2000 on Pandora/Pyra is not Linux, you can get around that on any desktop or notebook with Wine or a virtual machine, but the CPU architecture. Pandora and Pyra have a ARM CPU, just like smartphones and most onboard computers in modern cars, while foobar2000 expects x86, the architecture of desktops, compatible notebooks and most servers. You can get around that only with emulation, which uses up a lot of power and inserts bugs, and the fastest emulation for ARM -> x86 is Exagear Desktop which can only emulate a x86 Linux system, so you have to put Wine on top of that. If you look at the bugs people get in foobar just by using Wine and you imagine emulation on top of that, it's probably not going to be very usable. For normal games, a few bugs more or less doesn't matter too much, but a program that stands out because of its precision just should not be emulated if you've got alternatives that, while not as good, do not rely on emulation. I haven't tried DeadBeef or Audacious myself, but there are good videos about it, some of them even showing it running on Pandora.also :O Running Foobar in Linux
Granted, this is for an old version of foobar, but lots of stuff is missing, and you basically have to emulate it, which is probably battery kamikaze and tons of windows stuff arent supported. I guess I'll just have to hope this Deadbeef has an awesome FLAC decoder. And good interface.
Does foobar2000 sound better than other players?
No. Most of “sound quality differences” people “hear” are placebo effect (at least with real music), as actual differences in produced sound data are below their noise floor (1 or 2 last bits in 16bit samples). foobar2000 has sound processing features such as software resampling or 24bit output on new high-end soundcards, but most of the other mainstream players are capable of doing the same by now.