Djoga'Ro
moonstruck
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2016
- Messages
- 2,499
I doubt the "jury" has seen it in a short endless loop like we do. Their attention was with the man in danger. the little part of the subconscious, that dealt with the bowman might have attributed his being quiet and still to shock.Surely the absurd thing is how the judges(?) react. I mean, the archer is obviously unsurprised, the target's fall is controlled and theatrical, and very few people do genuinely dangerous stunts on stage.
They could have been prepared. By which I mean, whoever introduced the performance might subtly have stirred up some fear, with which those spectators would to a degree expect it going wrong and see it in their mind already. The act then just matched that, thus the reaction/interpretation was quick.
Dunno, to me it looks as if the arrow knocked back the head a little, which might be enough to lose balance. What hack to his nervous system the arrow does I do not know - I have too little data on that (should get me a bow probably). Doing nothing to regain balance might be an effect. Same with getting stiff and maybe even a little stretching one's feet?Plus, I seriously doubt an arrow can deliver a big enough impulse to knock someone over. To do that, you either need a very blunt weapon (say, a fist) or some sort of force-spreader (armour) on the victim. Isn't overanalysis fun?
[doublepost=1516820573,1516819468][/doublepost]What the... Took me a moment with mind being elsewhere to realize, what I've grabbed in the supermarket the other day, when my mind was elsewhere.
Thought, I'm gonna make me a somewhat normal pizza with hot dog "stuffing".