rmm21 said:
I would give up my life because there are people in this world who are important to me and there are those who I have never met who I value as well. Of course, that's an imbecilic statement you made that my one life will be the single deciding factor in saving the world. It's indicative of stating how dare you care more for yourself than others singularly or plural. I suppose you would nobly die to save us all because you value others above yourself right? That would mean you would die to save me regardless of my worth to you or my moral character. Thanks.
Let's try a different example. Imagine there's a poll, do we want the buttons to be laid out in a square, or diamond shape? Due to some mutation, your thumb is at a slight angle and you realize that a square would be absolutely perfect for you. You've used the diamond layout on other game systems, and you know you can get used to it, but square would be better. On the other hand, diamond is better for everyone else. Do you act selfishly and go for the perfect solution for yourself at the cost of everyone else, or take the mediocre solution to give the best experience for everyone else? I am saying that I would vote diamond. Your posts suggest you would pick the square.
"Why would you vote for that when the majority should already be voting for that anyway?" you might ask. The answer to that is the vocal minority I mentioned earlier. Assume 10% of the population have these wonky square thumbs. 99% of them are sick of living in a diamond world, so make sure they vote. On the other hand, the normal thumb people haven't had such experiences, they're less motivated to vote, so only 10% of them do. Your poll now shows about 9/19 in favour of diamond layout, and 10/19 in favour of square layout. Square layout wins, and 90% of the population suffers.
This two choice poll is a little contrived, and the reality is that it wouldn't be nearly so close, but if we increased it to 4 or 5 equal options, I think it becomes more obvious how a minority all voting for the same thing can easily surpass a majority with a lower turnout.
And that's why I vote for the choice that I think is good for all, not just the one that works best for me, to try and counter the vocal minority that doesn't consider the impact it will have on others.