J201605
Active Member
mr. driller, gran turismo 2, maybe someday pilotwings 64
Definitly. Works flawlessly on my crappy linux laptop that doesn't have as much beef as the pandora.Amit said:And Warcraft 2 being emulated on DosBox. Wait, that is possible right?
gibberish said:lots of n64 games on peoples wish list... how likely is it that itll even be able to emulate n64 well?
+1 my favorite n64 game right here.centrlink said:Definitely waverace 64 (countless hours playing against mates), perhaps with wireless multiplayer - may have to buy 2 Pandoras just for the occasion!
Clad said:Definitly. Works flawlessly on my crappy linux laptop that doesn't have as much beef as the pandora.Amit said:And Warcraft 2 being emulated on DosBox. Wait, that is possible right?
Crappy though your laptop may be, it's still using an x86 processor. Pandora will have a heck of a lot more overhead trying to emulate a DOS machine. You should probably not get your hopes up for WC2.
Chip said:Clad said:Definitly. Works flawlessly on my crappy linux laptop that doesn't have as much beef as the pandora.Amit said:And Warcraft 2 being emulated on DosBox. Wait, that is possible right?
Crappy though your laptop may be, it's still using an x86 processor. Pandora will have a heck of a lot more overhead trying to emulate a DOS machine. You should probably not get your hopes up for WC2.
http://n0p.tonych.info/?Stratagus_%26amp%3...A_%28640x480%29
Plays warcraft flawlessly at VGA on my PDA. (Except for bad controls and not enough memory for music.)
No reason why it can't run on the Pandora.
Going by what Exophase has recently said in another thread, it makes a heck of a difference:Clad said:How is the fact that my laptop is x86 powered relevant ?
Dosbox is a full blown emulator, it's not like wine or anything, the fact that the architecture emulated is or is not the same as the host doesn't change anything. Just look at the performance of the mac PPC version.
Exophase said:Look, we've already been through this. 80286 CPUs are a lot more powerful and more demanding to emulate than 68k (Amiga) and 65c816 (SNES). SNES has a lot of video hardware but it can get frameskipped into submission. DOSBox for PC isn't a slouch and it's certainly not "fast enough" on high end platforms to the point where there's no interest in emulating it. Even on the best CPUs around I doubt it'll emulate at the level of more than a 75MHz Pentium or so and that's really not good enough. But it's expensive. It's true that there are a lot of things it does that are PC specific that haven't been done on the ARM version and it's true that the thing could be faster overall but doing a dynarec is a lot of work.christo930 said:It's hard to quantify that last statement and I'm not a developer. I think a big part of the performance problem of dosbox is that it's ported from PC and that on the PC it's target hardware is pretty high. The reason I think emulating a 286 pc with ega graphicsc and an 8 bit sb, is the success of the Amiga emulation and the success of the snes.
And I think that that target is not something that's very interesting, I'd expect most people who aren't content with 8088 level emulation will want 386+ emulation.
He was talking about DosBox performance on the GP2X, but the speed bump from the GP2X to the Pandora is not going to allow a performance boost in DosBox to go from an 8088 to a Pentium 60 (the min. requirement for WC2). I don't know squat about programing emulators, but Exo does. I am inclined to take his word for it.
icurafu said:http://n0p.tonych.info/?Stratagus_%26amp%3...A_%28640x480%29
Plays warcraft flawlessly at VGA on my PDA. (Except for bad controls and not enough memory for music.)
No reason why it can't run on the Pandora.
I was not aware that there was a Strategus module that would allow you to use the WC2 data files directly. That rocks.