comradekingu
Glowing ember
To simply say you can do everything in your power to mislead backers and also provide zero evidence to suggest you aren't, would mean a scam is as good as any.
PGS has in addition to this broken rules, repetitively, been caught in lies, and to the knowledgeable and cautious mind paints a very clear narrative. KS needs to do something, otherwise it provides only a platform of unearnt reputation.
I don't know all that much about the razor, but it says 'suspended', rather than 'canceled', which i would imagine be the case for decidedly saying something is a scam. One that ive seen no projects under the status of.
The razor may have been at best slow, but did however make the claim that you could even save time using it, one it could not back up based on its function in current state. A breach of KS rules, which are all very fine, but it doesn't seem they are rigorously employed. It gives opportunity and shows motive, sure, but in the end if some scampaigns can get away, it will lead way to more of the sort.
What the PGS does is to reasonably say something we can assume to function can exist, given by our knowledge of existing technology.
It proves in no way any command of such technology, and simply re-uses variants thereof it to state its claim. Something which does not constitute a prototype. Re-use and promise is not at all what making something is, it may be the start thereof, but not sufficient to offer whats under development as a reward, yet again by KS own rules.
It should also follow that if you posses none of these qualities, no money should be offered. Here the PGS twarts reality by presenting distortion, in the form of illegal CGI, illusion of support, grandure, and a mental trait in following what seems good.
Which is another circle of KS illegality.
It is all offered at a selection of prices tuned to reward the supporting narrative, and no evidence suggests it can produce at, or actually without, and even negative margins.
Here the backer is actually accused of the burden of knowledge, as proof needs be presented by the campaign, in the form of a bill of material, contracts, etc. To the ability of the campaigner, as per KS rules.
That it is a design-project now, rather than a technology project, does not lift this, and takes us straight back to offering a product that is being designed, something design-projects are not exempt from.
So it is clear that the campaign, other than the t-shirts on offer, is a technology product, as per normal and not as incorrectly classified a design project.
Now you could invalidate any concern by out-sourcing it, much like promises made and not answered has been the life-blood of the scampaign. As such PGS has promised backing in the form of outside investors, time and time again, even citing the lack thereof as the reason to start the campaign. And further that the price is indicative of such outside backing.
There is mental midgetary and cognitive dissonance much too ingrained and plentiful to mention, but the case remains that its KS reputition on the line.
If they don't do anything about this, with the killing it is making, even paying shareholders, i will stop using it, and others will too.
You cannot reinvent yourself away from recourse, not in commerce, not in science.
PGS and KS are currently hand in hand trying to do so. I am proud that the Pyra can exist without and outside the realm of such parasites.
PGS has in addition to this broken rules, repetitively, been caught in lies, and to the knowledgeable and cautious mind paints a very clear narrative. KS needs to do something, otherwise it provides only a platform of unearnt reputation.
I don't know all that much about the razor, but it says 'suspended', rather than 'canceled', which i would imagine be the case for decidedly saying something is a scam. One that ive seen no projects under the status of.
The razor may have been at best slow, but did however make the claim that you could even save time using it, one it could not back up based on its function in current state. A breach of KS rules, which are all very fine, but it doesn't seem they are rigorously employed. It gives opportunity and shows motive, sure, but in the end if some scampaigns can get away, it will lead way to more of the sort.
What the PGS does is to reasonably say something we can assume to function can exist, given by our knowledge of existing technology.
It proves in no way any command of such technology, and simply re-uses variants thereof it to state its claim. Something which does not constitute a prototype. Re-use and promise is not at all what making something is, it may be the start thereof, but not sufficient to offer whats under development as a reward, yet again by KS own rules.
It should also follow that if you posses none of these qualities, no money should be offered. Here the PGS twarts reality by presenting distortion, in the form of illegal CGI, illusion of support, grandure, and a mental trait in following what seems good.
Which is another circle of KS illegality.
It is all offered at a selection of prices tuned to reward the supporting narrative, and no evidence suggests it can produce at, or actually without, and even negative margins.
Here the backer is actually accused of the burden of knowledge, as proof needs be presented by the campaign, in the form of a bill of material, contracts, etc. To the ability of the campaigner, as per KS rules.
That it is a design-project now, rather than a technology project, does not lift this, and takes us straight back to offering a product that is being designed, something design-projects are not exempt from.
So it is clear that the campaign, other than the t-shirts on offer, is a technology product, as per normal and not as incorrectly classified a design project.
Now you could invalidate any concern by out-sourcing it, much like promises made and not answered has been the life-blood of the scampaign. As such PGS has promised backing in the form of outside investors, time and time again, even citing the lack thereof as the reason to start the campaign. And further that the price is indicative of such outside backing.
There is mental midgetary and cognitive dissonance much too ingrained and plentiful to mention, but the case remains that its KS reputition on the line.
If they don't do anything about this, with the killing it is making, even paying shareholders, i will stop using it, and others will too.
You cannot reinvent yourself away from recourse, not in commerce, not in science.
PGS and KS are currently hand in hand trying to do so. I am proud that the Pyra can exist without and outside the realm of such parasites.
