WoD
Member
It's a forum! What do you expect! A sad truth. I wouldn't bother coming here if it wasn't for some burning need for any or all information related to the Pandora. Oh and boredom.
Ok now directly at you... no shit Sherlock...WoD said:It's a forum! What do you expect! A sad truth. I wouldn't bother coming here if it wasn't for some burning need for any or all information related to the Pandora. Oh and boredom.
lardman said:So much anger about someone trying to push the boundaries of what is accepted behaviour for a touchscreen. Strange attitude.
Not really. Multi touch design and single touch design are two different branches of UI. If someone says "can we have multi touch?" it's an implicit statement that multi touch is superior to single touch. There is no problem solved by multi touch that can't also be solved in single touch, and, with a well designed UI, be just as seamless as Apple has developed on the iPhone.
That's where the negativity is coming from. The single touch group are fixed in the belief that you only need single touch, and they're right. The multi touch group is fixed in the belief that if you have multi touch, it should be used, and they're also right. In a single touch environment, an excellent UI can be developed that uses just single touch in a beautiful and intuitive way. In a multi touch environment, the same is true but with multi touch.
The imperfect multi touch simulation hack makes the following statement, whether it was intended or not: single touch UI is bad enough that we prefer to use an imperfect hack to simulate a highly restrictive multi touch environment. This, of course, gets right up in the face of proponents of single touch interfaces, and is a proverbial slap against those actually working to develop such a single touch interface.
WizardStan said:Not really. Multi touch design and single touch design are two different branches of UI. If someone says "can we have multi touch?" it's an implicit statement that multi touch is superior to single touch. There is no problem solved by multi touch that can't also be solved in single touch, and, with a well designed UI, be just as seamless as Apple has developed on the iPhone.
I'll go one step further and point out that if this hack was implemented, you could get he same result by taping the "stationary" spot, then pressing and holding on the spot where the input would register in a "multi" situation and moving the stylus. The touchscreen registers the exact same input and the driver behaves the same whether you use two fingers or one. Clearly, this is not of legitimate usefulness.
The main reason I don't want people going on and on about how the Pandora can do multitouch is because it can't. If people keep insisting it can, eventually it's going to end up in yet another poorly researched blog post somewhere and I'll get emails about it. I already get about half a dozen emails a day about the Pandora, and an alarming number of them are along the lines of "I hear the Pandora can play N64 games. Where can I buy one?" We need to keep the level of misinformation to a minimum.
That's the multi-touch screen to you .Phawx said:The Pandora plays N64 games through the touch screen! WOOO.
Awesome news Chip!
Chip said:the Pandora can play N64 games.
Good to hear! Awesome!
on topic, why call it multitouch? it clearly isn't, its just a type of UI and I've seen similar things implemented before and not called multitouch.
Eniko said:Can you show us on the doll where the Pandora multi-touched you?
Sorry, I had to.