Epicenter posted on Dec 8 2006 at 06:36 AM said:
I wouldn't call the GP2X an accomplishment. It's more an embarassment.
Tell me, what other console on the market today offers what the GP2X offers? None. Sure, GP may offer something with similar capabilities, perhaps even surpassing the GP2X, but that is not now. That will be sometime in the future. Since there is no better alternative as of now, if you dislike it so damn much, stop posting here. Oh, you already said you'd do just that, say, five or six times already. You just can't help your little ego, can't you?
The GP2X is fun all around, from enjoying the wonderful software the community provides to writing some yourself. Oh, and I've been thinking about all your excuses concerning Stargazer, well, boo-hoo, hardware wasn't powerful enough for your ton of background layers, cry me a river. If you wanted to code a GP2X game, you'd take into account its specific hardware limitations, and not expect a port that runs fine on your PC to run the same on the GP2X. That's just plain spoiled and stupid. Just admit that you never intentioned to tailor certain parts of it for the 2X from the very beginning, well, that's extremely poor design on your part and on your part alone.
I also like how you threw technical insults at Payback (I recall something along the lines "I'm surprised you managed to get it out of the single digit frame rates"), but never bothered ONCE to back them up in any way, and quite frankly that does not surprise me. You may have some hardware knowledge, but that puts you in no position to throw words around without backing them up, counting on your 'reputation' to hold water for you.
- Alex