dsraa
Member
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2004
- Messages
- 286
Peter R said:But DCGM would argue, as he did in the other topic, that a typo is acceptable incomparison to a grammatical error.ledow said:Please just let me be the first to point out that you spelled grammar incorrectly in the poll title ("grammer") but got the post-title correct. :lol:
People in my area of the country say "should of" instead of "should have" when speaking in person. Furthermore, I do not believe I have made that mistake for quite some times and the meaning is the same and it is still easily understandable. That is a stupid grammatical error to fault me on. It makes no difference as long as the conveyed meaning is still the same.daclassicgamingmaster said:Peter, you really are an arrogant worm.
I have a problem with native speakers making the same grammatical errors over and over. You, Peter, constantly say "should of" and "would of". We've pointed it out to you several times, but you make no point in correcting it. It's an elementary mistake, and at age 19 (or however old you are), you shouldn't be making it.
I see your point but I disagree. The fact that you say what you say when you say it, will create a dimensional time rift of which the entry point of what you said versus what you 'should have' said will go into a never ending loop of mistake and mis-fortunes.
DSR
BTW The bird is the word!
Last edited by a moderator: