What a great start - prepare for the next level!
- Thread starter EvilDragon
- Start date
Djoga'Ro
moonstruck
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2016
- Messages
- 2,499
No idea, what you're getting at. ?
slaeshjag
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Don't mind him. He drones on about political shit all the time with no context. Just let him be.
Djoga'Ro
moonstruck
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2016
- Messages
- 2,499
Just thought he might have something interesting to say.
FaeMinx
Rainbow Liberation Instigation
Whereas I drone on about contextual shit all the time with no politics. So do mind me... though I think humans should let me be too...
Djoga'Ro
moonstruck
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2016
- Messages
- 2,499
Seen the picture of mine to the left? Do I look human to you?
FaeMinx
Rainbow Liberation Instigation
You look like something born in a windtunnel.
Caine
Hardcore Member
OMG!! It's over 600...
Dang. It just doesn't work this way.... Order up everyone, only 8400 to go
Dang. It just doesn't work this way.... Order up everyone, only 8400 to go
Over 600 !
In other words, to stay with the Ancient Greek theme: the number of future Pyrates is now more than
plus
In other words, to stay with the Ancient Greek theme: the number of future Pyrates is now more than
plus
Neelix
Insecticidal Maniac
It's a grammatical device, not a mathematical device, so the expression needs to be evaluated in a grammatical context, not a mathematical one.
I recently pointed out a grammatical error (in a language forum, so it was on topic and appropriate to do so) in a stated mathematical expression. One person entirely missed my point because they were only seeing the mathematical expression itself, which was correct, and failed to evaluate the way in which it was stated, which was not correct.-Neelix
Neelix
Insecticidal Maniac
True, but the point is that when discussing the grammatical correctness of the statement, the actual colour of the sun is irrelevant.
Someone pointed out your grammar was incorrect. Your response was was a mathematical proof, that ignored the fact that the expression itself wasn't actually a single mathematical expression but 3 mathematical expressions joined in a grammatical construct to communicate the 3 different dimensions of the object.
-Neelix
Someone pointed out your grammar was incorrect. Your response was was a mathematical proof, that ignored the fact that the expression itself wasn't actually a single mathematical expression but 3 mathematical expressions joined in a grammatical construct to communicate the 3 different dimensions of the object.
-Neelix
If you define "green energy" as energy that that can be harnessed with little pollution on earth. Then the sun is very green.
However, if you find X-rays "pollution", and with the dwindling ozone, this "green" light is gonna cost us...
stevenc99
Member
- Joined
- May 10, 2016
- Messages
- 99
I don't mean to nitpick, guys. but x is the glyph for Latin script lowercase letter X. To be typographically correct, you should use the multiply symbol or dimension sign: ×
rygD
Nihilistic Mystic
I forgot if it will be on the Pyra keyboard, and I don't have a picture handy. I know we get some other characters that may be of use for certain things. Is this one of them?
While we're on the topic, is using * for multiplication correct? My calculator displays that. It could be confusing with the background of some people here, and so many Linux users.
Djoga'Ro
moonstruck
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2016
- Messages
- 2,499
You can use "ß", if you so wish. Just declare it first. But that's the mathematical side, which nobody's interested in. ;P
Neelix
Insecticidal Maniac
Still missing the point. The dimensions are three individual measurements, not an expression of the volume of the device. The dimensions are therefore expressed in cm or mm, not cm³.
-Neelix
