Oh thanks, why didn't I think to read the wiki?@AVahne modem is on the mainboard, i believe.
https://www.pyra-handheld.com/wiki/index.php?title=Mainboard
Welp, I know what to save up for now.
Oh thanks, why didn't I think to read the wiki?@AVahne modem is on the mainboard, i believe.
https://www.pyra-handheld.com/wiki/index.php?title=Mainboard
Hi all,
Is there any chance to replace the .....
Of course it does, almost every other DAC does the same. It provides typical smartphone power level which is good for typical 16-20 Ohm headphones.The twl6040 chip handles headphone amplification.
maybe when they do the 1st board upgrade when the pyra takes off they will look that. i also would love the usb-c also, but i can wait for itType-C requires a lot more than just exchanging the socket, because it introduced a lot of new features. The new alternate modes and the fact that it can be used upside down require a more complex wiring and you'll likely won't get around adding another IC, there's just no room to do that. There's a reason why one of the ICs near the backside uses a weird angle on the PCB (aka "wonky chip").
Of course it does, almost every other DAC does the same. It provides typical smartphone power level which is good for typical 16-20 Ohm headphones.
Additional amplification is needed for higher impedance headphones and quality headphones are usually in that category.
Of course it does, almost every other DAC does the same. It provides typical smartphone power level which is good for typical 16-20 Ohm headphones.
Additional amplification is needed for higher impedance headphones and quality headphones are usually in that category.
Actually looking at the specs of the headphone amplifier in the Pandora vs the Pyra they're practically the same in terms of driving capabilities.
Pandora - http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tpa6110a2.pdf
Pyra - http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/twl6040.pdf
Hmm how about some more random info from your dmesg.. Is the 4GiB part working now with LPAE?
He (m@t) is really a drolly kind of fellow, isn't he ? Always asking and moaning the same, while everybody here in the forum tried to explain him, that
Go on ED and make our dreams of a wonderful and unrivaled Linux handheld device possible.
- There was never given a de facto release date for distributing the Pyra.
- That ED always stated, he tries to deliver a maximum possible functional Pyra.
- That it's in our all interest to clear out problems before delivering Pyras as far as possible even if this results in a further delay.
- That this project is a community driven project and not comparable with projects driven by multi million/billion dollar companies.
- And last but not least: We all trust in ED because of his sublime and outstanding handling of the Pandora project.
Actually looking at the specs of the headphone amplifier in the Pandora vs the Pyra they're practically the same in terms of driving capabilities.
Pandora - http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tpa6110a2.pdf
Pyra - http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/twl6040.pdf
Yes but those mainly use the big jacks unlike 'smartphone headphones', so you cant insert those anyway. Convertors are available but imo the soundquality that is produced with or wihout amp won't really be up to par for quality headphones.
Yo Tony! What brought you here?
It does run in LPAE, but with 2GB still so far. The other half is still having a bit of a fight with the init since it's dual-rank, so not much examples around, and the ram init code in u-boot is... not very transparent, especially since TI is using undocumented PHY registers there I haven't actually even managed to find yet where it's setting certain registers, but when I inspected them they turned out to contain nonsentical values for the second rank.
Note that the sort of situation the kernel gets (with a large part not accessible by other initiators) can of course already be tested with 2GB ram: just tell the kernel it has two ranges:
- 0'800'00'000 - 0'BFF'FF'FFF (1 GB)
- 2'C00'00'000 - 2'FFF'FF'FFF (1 GB)
Somewhat outdated Gamescom 2016 experience here, but it was essentially a non-issue for me. I think the action buttons stopped at a height before you'd even push down keyboard keys.I'm still concerned at how close the bottom of the dpad and the X button are to the keyboard keys. I have large thumbs, I can see myself accidentally hitting a key when going for d-pad down or the X button.
I know ED said this was a real issue when doing early tests and was looking to address the issue. I think ED said he was adjusting the height of the keys/ buttons to address it. I'm wondering if there still is an issue there?
Also n-tuple-check the pin muxing for cke1 and ncs1..
Something what I'd rather want to know: What happened to the heat spreading solution? I know it's supposed to be a simple thing, but has any work towards that been done yet?
It's essentially just dumping the heat into the ground plane of the main PCB.That's something I'd like to know also, ie what is the cooling solution going into the Pyra?. Is there any?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/why-do-sloths-hang-upside-down-9287482.htmlThe second one was upside-down (which was weird).
Yeah! Do that!
Thank you people who know more than me. 2 Months coming up.....