Rob
Member
I think that it is from the spin-off company. You have told us by yourself that their hanheld would be more powerful and this handheld seems to be very powerful. Plus the Gamepark Holdings' handheld won't be called XGP.
Quiest posted on Jul 20 2005 at 12:11 AM said:Jarska333 posted on Jul 19 2005 at 10:52 PM said:Augh. :lol:
The beaver game.... From Al Love....
Looks nice,...
the screen aswell. :rolleyes:
It`s Al Lowe, isn`t it?
Why the wrong system? Consider it as the other system! B) All I am trying to say is taht the front page link is at its correct place, together with this thread, together with the Gamepark SPIN-OFF company.TandeM posted on Jul 20 2005 at 02:28 AM said:The front page link may be a bit overboard for the "wrong" system, though. Of course, I'm not the admin...
craigix posted on Jul 20 2005 at 12:32 AM said:Well this ain't the new GP32... thats for certain...
Just seeing DaveC getting upset about the screen was enough to require some calm, or else these rumours will plague the new system forever. Just like the BLU+ shit which still goes on to this day...
But DaveC - that oddball screen is NOT part of the new GP
-Craig
www.gbax.com
AH! It's not! Craig said it's not, so it's not. Chill.DaveC posted on Jul 19 2005 at 11:06 PM said:If it is
shinneri posted on Jul 20 2005 at 03:20 AM said:AH! It's not! Craig said it's not, so it's not. Chill.DaveC posted on Jul 19 2005 at 11:06 PM said:If it is
Anyway, this probably is that XGP, but who's going to want that if it's not even open and more expensive with undoubtedly subpar games...
DaveC posted on Jul 20 2005 at 03:24 AM said:shinneri posted on Jul 20 2005 at 03:20 AM said:AH! It's not! Craig said it's not, so it's not. Chill.DaveC posted on Jul 19 2005 at 11:06 PM said:If it is
Anyway, this probably is that XGP, but who's going to want that if it's not even open and more expensive with undoubtedly subpar games...
boradori says it is, Craig says no. So who knows what is going on. All I know is if it is like that It would be pointless, a PSP clone without games, buy a PSP instead. Get a 1.5 and it will be more open too.
EvilDragon posted on Jul 14 2005 at 07:33 AM said:Okay. I think it's okay to tell you that much:
GamePark broke up because one of them wanted a new, very powerful handheld with incredible system specs (which would be much more expensive, think of Zodiac).
And the other guy wanted a new handheld, which hasn't totally uber-specs, but isn't more expensive than the GP32 had been.
Esn posted on Jul 20 2005 at 04:05 AM said:DaveC posted on Jul 20 2005 at 03:24 AM said:shinneri posted on Jul 20 2005 at 03:20 AM said:AH! It's not! Craig said it's not, so it's not. Chill.DaveC posted on Jul 19 2005 at 11:06 PM said:If it is
Anyway, this probably is that XGP, but who's going to want that if it's not even open and more expensive with undoubtedly subpar games...
boradori says it is, Craig says no. So who knows what is going on. All I know is if it is like that It would be pointless, a PSP clone without games, buy a PSP instead. Get a 1.5 and it will be more open too.
Are you capable of reading and comprehending what you read? As has already been said many times, Gamepark has split up into two different companies - AFAIK one is called Gamepark and one is called Gamepark Holdings. Some people call Gamepark Holdings the "spin-off company"; others (like craigix) call Gamepark the "spin-off company". Not that it really matters. The point is this:
EvilDragon posted on Jul 14 2005 at 07:33 AM said:Okay. I think it's okay to tell you that much:
GamePark broke up because one of them wanted a new, very powerful handheld with incredible system specs (which would be much more expensive, think of Zodiac).
And the other guy wanted a new handheld, which hasn't totally uber-specs, but isn't more expensive than the GP32 had been.
It rather looks to me like GamePark contracted an out source for their A/S, website management, and sales.
Gamepark Holdings has no say on development as far as I can tell.
Esn posted on Jul 20 2005 at 04:12 AM said:It rather looks to me like GamePark contracted an out source for their A/S, website management, and sales.
Gamepark Holdings has no say on development as far as I can tell.
Are you saying that EvilDragon and craigix are wrong, then?
shinneri posted on Jul 20 2005 at 04:19 AM said:polooo2, thank you very much for clearing everything up.
So that's the XGP (the specs polooo2 has posted), which will obviously be the company that retains the Gamepark name. I suppose we have no confirmation or denial of BC or openness on that one.
The other console (BumHong Lee's? ) is the one that Craig and ED have been telling us about, which will be a more conservative, original GP-like console. And they'll be getting a new company name, which I find really exciting for some reason.
Everything's making sense again!!