Definately yes.
For videochat applications nainly and maybe for taking some pictures on the go and directly editing them with gimp or something.
This is something no camera or smartphone can do today
I must say, however, that I see absolutely no point in having only a user-facing camera. If we include a user facing camera, it should either be a swivel camera that can cover front and back, or we should in addition have one that is on the back.Yes, user facing for video conferencing.
I'm pretty sure that using the Pyra as a mobile phone has long been ruled out. EvilDragon said he was considering 3G, but that was for data.Are people saying no because paranoia?
Would buy it to replace my phone, if it had everything that makes up one.
I guess that weakens my need for cameras on it.I'm pretty sure that using the Pyra as a mobile phone has long been ruled out. EvilDragon said he was considering 3G, but that was for data.
-God Ginrai
The 2ds has 3 cameras for whatever reason.You are making absolutely no sense with that comment. 3 cameras are not necessary to emulate the 3DS.
-God Ginrai
The 2ds is really just one 2d screen.^^^yeah. It would need a 3d screen and two screens also.
I realize that the 3DS and the 2DS have 3 cameras. I am stating that they are not necessary to successfully emulate the 3DS. Hell, few enough games even make use of them.The 2ds has 3 cameras for whatever reason.
There are around 6 3DS games that currently use AR, and only 2 of them use it for their main gameplay. And the user-facing camera has been used for even less. (MiiMaker, Face Raiders, and StarFox 64 3D are the only ones that come to mind)Yes you do the 3DS has one on the front used for applications and it has two on the front to use the ai 3d card things witch some games might use.You are making absolutely no sense with that comment. 3 cameras are not necessary to emulate the 3DS.
-God Ginrai