Fishbong
man of poor reputation
I have built a batterypack with electronic regulation. Lasts 9 hours on 4 non - rechargeable batteries.
Jarska333 posted on May 17 2006 at 05:46 PM said:But the main use for 2X is on the road, using batteries or rechargeables. Too high OC gives wrong impression of emulators current capabilities, on the actually sensible mhz's.
nickspoon posted on May 17 2006 at 02:06 PM said:Now I wish I hadn't sold my PS1 games
luck+power source for anything above 260Paulo Becker posted on May 17 2006 at 07:09 PM said:nickspoon posted on May 17 2006 at 02:06 PM said:Now I wish I hadn't sold my PS1 games
Well, maybe you didn't sell them...
On a serious note though, and forgive me for going slightly off topic but since overclockling came to light in the thread, I have a little question concerning OCing: does the speed to which one can OC a GP2X depend entirely on luck (as with usual processors, some go to higher speeds even while being the same model/rated speed), meaning, maybe the one I get will only overclock stably up to 220 MHz while other people's could go up to 350?
moz posted on May 17 2006 at 03:14 PM said:luck+power source for anything above 260
Paradox posted on May 17 2006 at 03:14 PM said:yep, thats right. i can't even OC to 230 without it crashing instantly. though if you have a low overclock ability like mine get some good thermal pads and just stick them over the processor and you'll get an extra 20-30mhz out of it
Coolness. If it resembles the Bell curve, it's probably accurate. I just hope I don't end up in the negative deviation area ¬_¬'rokdcasbah posted on May 17 2006 at 04:23 PM said:it's based on the claims made in the "highest overclock thread". there's not enough data there for it to be very accurate, and bear in mind that a lot of people probably didn't play long enough at these speeds to find out how stable they were. but many of these are stable.
rokdcasbah posted on May 17 2006 at 09:32 PM said:but really, who cares 275 seems to be the sweet spot for most people. i was surprised that it was not 266, though there's a lot of those as well.
kardasan posted on May 18 2006 at 12:19 AM said:rokdcasbah posted on May 17 2006 at 09:32 PM said:but really, who cares 275 seems to be the sweet spot for most people. i was surprised that it was not 266, though there's a lot of those as well.
And that would be on batteries, Accus or on Power adapter? I'm getting crazy because my unit goes only to 255 on 2x2500mAh Energizer accus
Jarska333 posted on May 17 2006 at 05:31 PM said:kardasan posted on May 18 2006 at 12:19 AM said:rokdcasbah posted on May 17 2006 at 09:32 PM said:but really, who cares 275 seems to be the sweet spot for most people. i was surprised that it was not 266, though there's a lot of those as well.
And that would be on batteries, Accus or on Power adapter? I'm getting crazy because my unit goes only to 255 on 2x2500mAh Energizer accus
It depends on the voltage, not amperage. Your accu's are 1.2 volts, I'd assume, they all seem to be. A battery bought from store, non-rechargeable, is 1.5 volts. More volts, more stable overclock. Though, 4.5 volts might just fry your 2X.