I've been intending to work on a game for my Pandy when it arrives, so does that mean I get one first too? Yeah, that also sounds like a good ideaMiner49er said:spinghed said:I'd love one, but the devs need them more... poos!
rick
Who decides who is an official dev?
I mean, I've been working on a game intended for my Pandy when it arrives, so does that mean I get one first? Yeah, that sounds like a good idea
Vorporeal said:We're all saying the same stuff here, but nobody's really conglomerating the most agreed-with posts into one, so I'll take this opportunity to do just that.
The major complaint that people have with sending the first 100 to devs is that the original "contract"/statement/agreement was that Pandoras would be shipped out on a first-come, first-served basis. Of course, it would be in OPLtd's best interests to uphold this, as customer backlash and dissatisfaction with service is never good for a company, especially one this small that is still trying to get recognized and get their first round of product out the door. This means that they can't ship out the first 100 with no regard for the order in which they were ordered.
The major complaint that people have with strictly sticking to the original order is that these users (as hardcore as they may be) are going to have very little software to test. Another issue brought up by one or two people was that if they did find a problem, a dev might be able to identify and fix the problem, making no extra work for the Pandora team, whereas a normal user might just identify and report it. If devs received the first hundred Pandoras, they'd be able to assist in both writing software and fixing the issues that the device has. This is an IMMENSELY useful resource - one that we shouldn't forget about.
So now the problem arises - how do we combine these two very important methods into one that fulfills the first-come, first-serve "rule", but still gets a good number of early devices out to developers? The answer is simple - you send emails to each of the first hundred people on the list, asking them if they would be willing to be pushed back slightly in the order and have their Pandora be shipped to a developer instead. There would be no compensation for doing this - it would be people making an honest decision as to whether they'd have enough time to thoroughly test it, or if they feel that the extra week or two would be spent better having a developer test the Pandora and get their software working on it. If someone did decide to give their spot up to a developer, they would be moved back to IMMEDIATELY after the first 100, in the same order as they were originally. Meaning, if Order #15 and Order #63 gave up their spots, they would become Order #101 and Order #102, respectively. Any devs who ordered the device normally, but got pushed into the first 100 through this method would give up their original spot in line for their new one.
I'm not stating anything new here, just trying to make one post that summarizes the ideas that have been floating around in this thread. In my opinion, this is both a good solution (gets a decent number of the first hundred out to developers), and an acceptable solution (doesn't replace people's spot in line without their consent). If anyone has any ideas/additions/changes they feel should be made to this to improve it, make yourself heard - it's in ALL of our interests to come up with a good way of distributing the first hundred Pandoras.
Hopefully.Gruso said:It's worth remembering that we're only talking about a short period of time between the first ones going out, and the rest of the batch going out.
I think this conversation is suffering from the same philosophical split that has plagued many other conversations here.Projects like (for example) Human Condition or NullDCe won't be done in a few weeks, whether these guys get hardware or not. But things like PandoraPanic, Galactic Artifact, and We Come In Peace probably could. Guys like Exophase, Firefox and Adventus could probably churn out some stuff quickly too.
VRAndy said:Half of the group is thinking to themselves "It's a game console. You can't ship a game console without games, and a slick launcher! It's just common sense! Why can't people understand that? Are they impatient, greedy or stupid?"
The other half is thinking "It's a computer! I know how to use a computer! Are you telling me there's a chance my place in line might be bumped so someone can write a game? Why are people going along with this? Are they suck ups? Do they really not know how to use a computer? Are they so impatient that they won't be able to go two weeks without playing a game?"
VRAndy said:Hopefully.Gruso said:It's worth remembering that we're only talking about a short period of time between the first ones going out, and the rest of the batch going out.
I think this conversation is suffering from the same philosophical split that has plagued many other conversations here.Projects like (for example) Human Condition or NullDCe won't be done in a few weeks, whether these guys get hardware or not. But things like PandoraPanic, Galactic Artifact, and We Come In Peace probably could. Guys like Exophase, Firefox and Adventus could probably churn out some stuff quickly too.
Half of the group is thinking to themselves "It's a game console. You can't ship a game console without games, and a slick launcher! It's just common sense! Why can't people understand that? Are they impatient, greedy or stupid?"
The other half is thinking "It's a computer! I know how to use a computer! Are you telling me there's a chance my place in line might be bumped so someone can write a game? Why are people going along with this? Are they suck ups? Do they really not know how to use a computer? Are they so impatient that they won't be able to go two weeks without playing a game?"
I think the majority of the flame wars on the topic of Pandora are based on this fundamental difference between the two groups of Pandora pre-orderers, and people from each group forgetting that people from the other group exist.