Then I'm asked to start a thread a coupla few times. /yawn
Why are you yawning? You said you had some technical information for us that contras Exophase's comments.
Do you want me to create an empty thread where the first post reads "Space for Overgauss and Exophase to discuss technical details relating to assembly, CPUs and multi-cores" just so you'll post?
If it'll get you to post said information, I will, but it just seems silly to have the first post of a topic saying "...Waiting for Players 1 and 2...", though any one else chipping in, I could insert a post saying "A New Challenger Has Arrived"
You misread my post. I didn't claim that I had some technical information for you that contras (sic) Ep's comments. What I did say was that if Ep wanted to continue to argue about nonsense that he should feel free to start another post outside of *this thread so that we can remain on topic.
To all in general:
If you noticed Ep is insisting that I make some thread, when I already told him to start one himself if he wanted to go on about whatever. It is the height of rediculousness for him to instead insist that I make some thread, when evidently he can't be bothered to do it himself. I merely said that I did not necessarily agree with every comment he made concerning those topics. You guys blew this thing up into some whole affair because you guys can't understand what is written and infer all sorts of nonsense.
This person talks about prefering not to wage personal wars when in fact that is all he does. He accuses me of ad-hominems through ad-hominem attacks. He clarifies no one likes me as part of his argument when most people already get that. Even my likes of others posts seem to disappear,
then reappear as "other".[E: Maybe this was a forum hiccup. It shows now]
He claims he was responding to a highly combative post, when that was not the case whatsoever. In fact his response was combative and approached ridicutard levels when he tried to besmirch me for not donating to the preorder cause because I'm trying to get a refund. Only on these boards does it make sense for someone to donate money that they don't have to expedite a refund that they need due to financial/health reasons!
His every response is based on an erroneous assumption that he has made. He doesn't even have the capability to understand sarcasm when it smacks him in the face. He posts TIRADES in response to
three mere sentences and a hyperlink. Really? That's all it takes? He continually makes personal attacks then says some craziness about if you "can't make a post without making personal attacks" blah blah blah. Then on top of it he wonders why I made a hyperlink. This is the epitome of his bias acting in such a way that invokes the old kettle calling the pot black saying. Is this really rocket science?
If he was interested in talking about whatever he was interested in talking about with me he should have started a thread about it. It was clear that I had no interest starting discussion about it here, and it is pretty redicutarded to *insist I start a thread after my intentions were made clear. His response was ego fueled and his thinking so obsfucated that he dosen't even understand what was said.
In the past I've told him that if he continues to swing from my nuts, he's not going to like what I say because I will take the kid gloves off and speak frankly. His response was to holler and yell for mod ques and such because now I was threatening him. This time around I say if you want to yell at me or whatever go for it, get it off your chest, but I won't engage in the same activity because I want to keep this thread positive. His response is now that he "doesn't appreciate me holding back." This is sane behaviour? If I don't hold back he's going to rage, but if I do hold back he doesn't appreciate it?
Ep merely remains bitter because I destroyed him in that micro-sd thread long ago. Since then he takes every swipe he can. I spell out to him that although I could do the same I choose not to even though I would enjoy it. So essentially this boils down to him being mad because I won't swing from his nuts 24/7 like he does mine. He's already admitted that he can't destroy my arguments in the past and instead prefers to direct his attention to the
FORM of my arguments and posting style.
For instance my last post before this page was on page 9. I let everyone get their say in, come back after a time and it is now on page 23. Fuq me for responding right? Fuq me for clarifying that there was some kind of misunderstanding created by others regarding some technical discussion right? Fuq me for stating if you want to argue start another thread right? Fuq me for saying "hey man, you seem to be on my nuts abit, how about you back up off of them because believe you me there was plenty of occasion I could have destroyed yours but didn't" right?
If you just want to make an attack on my character (while doing so in about the most blatantly personally motivated way possible) then I'm going to have to refute that.
I'm saying it amuses me that you call someone biased when you are so biased you attack claims I've never made and continue to miss my point. If you don't get it you don't get it. Simple as that.
I only argue with you because I hate you, and therefore everything I say to you is nullified.
I never made either claim. It seems you've fallen for a logical fallacy. I suggest before you run off at the mouth you actually counter things that have been said instead of the things that your bias makes you imagine is being said.
My comments begin
here. Feel free to
read comprehend them so that this time you can bring up points that are actually counter to what I've said. Since this is an old thread, there's probably no harm in me destroying you here. Feel confident that as always you will be able to call me whatever vulgarity you wish, while my own comments in response to your vulgarity will be heavily modded.
That being said, life is literally too short for me right now, to continually be monitoring this thread daily, so I will get to your responses when I get to them.
