Dead individuals don't have a choice. For them to have a choice we first need to keep them alive (unless they choose suicide). So you're basically saying healthier and richer individuals deserve more freedom.The most important thing is individuals having a choice.
So you'll never be happy. Same exact number of deaths as circumstances change, new pandemics come, etc is an unrealistic expectation.In a unfettered pandemic excess deaths are positive. If excess deaths are negative it's due to an over reaction.
Pandemics are exponential phenomena, throtling measures to keep the curbes flat is doomed to fail. There's also long COVID and other uundesirable outcomes of COVID, not only death.
I don't see why my neighbor should have the freedom to kill me. Even if he just meant to party. All businesses have sanitary restrictions (against salmonella, legionella or against COVID).Of course lockdown means fewer deaths across the board but this is irrelevant. Individual freedom is too precious.
That's the function of governments. If you want absolute freedom and anarchy you don't want governments at all, but then you get pandemics (unless your population is much wiser than it is).
A government restricting gatherings because they may boost opposition is abusive, restricting gatherings because they replicate killer viruses is not.