Male and female suicide rates are out of total male population and total female population, respectively (i.e. total number of male suicides divided by total male population).
Sort it by both sexes and it is easier to see (unless I messed up). I trust it to be accurate, Americans make lots of babies. Gotta have babies so there are more people to sell stuff to, and so there are plenty of people to use for future wars.Sort this by male... see U.S.A. being the only country having a NEGATIVE index (this means that when there is a suicide in north american soil... people get BORN... lol)... but still being in 50th place.... does not make sense. Starting to trust wikipedia less and less...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate
...to bomb more countries with oil sources and make even more pissed off refugees flooding us and therefore destabilizing the middle east and Europe at the same time, hooray.Sort it by both sexes and it is easier to see (unless I messed up). I trust it to be accurate, Americans make lots of babies. Gotta have babies so there are more people to sell stuff to, and so there are plenty of people to use for future wars.
I wonder what the reason will be after oil isn't as important/available. It doesn't really matter as long as the US keeps the rest of the world under their thumb. China might be a problem....to bomb more countries with oil sources and make even more pissed off refugees flooding us and therefore destabilizing the middle east and Europe at the same time, hooray.
Wikipedia is a publicly editable resource. In this case, 3 days ago on April 6th, someone changed it from it's previous value of 12.1 (make it tied for 50th with Uruguay) to -6.3. Why did they do this? No idea. Since it's clearly wrong I went ahead and undid the edit for you. It's back to the 12.1 that it had been for who knows how long, at least 3 months.Starting to trust wikipedia less and less...
Good call. Thanks for fixing the vandalism. This is why Wikipedia is shunned in education.Wikipedia is a publicly editable resource. In this case, 3 days ago on April 6th, someone changed it from it's previous value of 12.1 (make it tied for 50th with Uruguay) to -6.3. Why did they do this? No idea. Since it's clearly wrong I went ahead and undid the edit for you. It's back to the 12.1 that it had been for who knows how long, at least 3 months.
Good call. Thanks for fixing the vandalism. This is why Wikipedia is shunned in education.
The newspaper clearly says 2050....They warned us in 1993...
If those were the only problems with using Wikipedia as a source they could easily be discussed and explained, just like using a periodical or a video.
I still think it rather needs more immigrants from the warzones it creates instead of babies.Regardless, America needs more babies so they can become future consumers and warfighters.
Nah, they need to be kept out based on their religion and probably skin-tone and culture, but we won't talk about those two, because that might piss more people off. Religious freedom only applies to those already in the country, and even then it has to be from the approved list. You wouldn't want those outsiders coming in and causing problems. It is better that they go somewhere else where everyone can be happy together.I still think it rather needs more immigrants from the warzones it creates instead of babies.