Xcl4m4t10n
Advanced Member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2009
- Messages
- 1,209
I have been several minutes trying to localize the message but I can't .
How about games whe allready know from Pandora, as Return to Castle Wolfenstein, Duke Nukem 3D, or the Jedi Knights Games??
something like Openmorrowind would be also great
and our fafered Emulators (N64, DS, PSX, NES SNES, GB GBC GBA, Master System Gamegear, Genesis(Megadrive) Dreamcast, Atari, Amiga C64 , Neo GEO, PSP, and so one..
i wants the Pyra to run all my things i know and like from Pandora, but better ...
If you allow me to make a request I would like to see how runs commandos on the devboard, seems that there is a demo available.
http://games.softpedia.com/get/Games-Demo/Commandos--Behind-Enemy-Lines.shtml
It isn't more complex than diablo 2, I expect it to run pretty well.
Indeed exagear is very promising, if it can only run 2D games/applications it will be a nice addition, but if at some point (3D driver provided and everything) it's able to run more complex games, it can be the killer program of Pyra.
Any luck with Steam yet? I'd like to see Half-Life, possibly HL2 attempted as well. If possible, also Xash3D so we can see some comparative performance of exagear.
Wait we might get steam on the Pyra?
Trashy, have you tried Starcraft over Exagear?
I wonder how well it compares against the static recompile.
Steam is mostly a software acquisition and download tool. If you're not actively installing/downloading something, there isn't much for it to do. I.e. I would be a bit surprised if Steam itself actually requires much more for overhead than an inactive web browser with 1-2 tabs open would.Wait we might get steam on the Pyra?
Yeah, but don't expect too much out of it... it requires slow x86 emulation. older games may be playable when 3D acceleration is working. Hard to say where the threshold of playability will be once that is working. It may be better to for some of these games to not have the overhead of running steam in the background.
you would think, but it's still running via an x86 emulation running an x86 Debian Wheezy chroot then on top running steam. It's not as efficient as a browser with 2 tabs open.Steam is mostly a software acquisition and download tool. If you're not actively installing/downloading something, there isn't much for it to do. I.e. I would be a bit surprised if Steam itself actually requires much more for overhead than an inactive web browser with 1-2 tabs open would.
That just gave me a thought... In that scenario would a game launched from steam spawn a new x86 chroot or call the one that steam was originally running in?you would think, but it's still running via an x86 emulation running an x86 Debian Wheezy chroot then on top running steam. It's not as efficient as a browser with 2 tabs open.Steam is mostly a software acquisition and download tool. If you're not actively installing/downloading something, there isn't much for it to do. I.e. I would be a bit surprised if Steam itself actually requires much more for overhead than an inactive web browser with 1-2 tabs open would.
I would like to believe the latter, but I do see a lot of instances of exagear in the process list...That just gave me a thought... In that scenario would a game launched from steam spawn a new x86 chroot or call the one that steam was originally running in?you would think, but it's still running via an x86 emulation running an x86 Debian Wheezy chroot then on top running steam. It's not as efficient as a browser with 2 tabs open.Steam is mostly a software acquisition and download tool. If you're not actively installing/downloading something, there isn't much for it to do. I.e. I would be a bit surprised if Steam itself actually requires much more for overhead than an inactive web browser with 1-2 tabs open would.
Do you have any Steam games that you can launch without Steam running? I.e. offline-mode? I'm wondering if the performance differs vs with Steam running.I would like to believe the latter, but I do see a lot of instances of exagear in the process list...That just gave me a thought... In that scenario would a game launched from steam spawn a new x86 chroot or call the one that steam was originally running in?you would think, but it's still running via an x86 emulation running an x86 Debian Wheezy chroot then on top running steam. It's not as efficient as a browser with 2 tabs open.Steam is mostly a software acquisition and download tool. If you're not actively installing/downloading something, there isn't much for it to do. I.e. I would be a bit surprised if Steam itself actually requires much more for overhead than an inactive web browser with 1-2 tabs open would.