Uk General Election 2005

[spray]

you know what i'm going to base my vote on this year?

Chavs

whichever party can most convince me that they are the ones who can destroy these scum will get my vote.

At the moment, labour is looking weak, its definitely since 1997 that this "class" has appeare.

 

[Goity]

you know what i'm going to base my vote on this year?

Chavs

whichever party can most convince me that they are the ones who can destroy these scum will get my vote.

At the moment, labour is looking weak, its definitely since 1997 that this "class" has appeare.

​

So who is gonna legalise killing of chavs through monster trucks? That is my Dream job. If I had voting powers I would vvote for them.

Speaking of which, has anyone in Derbyshire seen the new Chav petting Zoo in Matlock yet? :huh:

 

[sam fisher]

for the last time . noone has!

 

[lubidog]

I just can't stand the ideological politics of new labour - ban this, promote this, think like this, be 'on-message', the awful grammatical mistake of 'forward not back' (anyone need a verb 'round here), the fact that it doesn't matter if the problem IS fixed-just that it must LOOK fixed, the fact that labour has changed constituency boundaries so that the Tories must have a 10% lead on the night to have a majority of 1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Britain a democracy? HAHAHAHAH

No, it stinks.

And as for the libdems, some people will do anything for the vote. Charley boy must have been banging his missus like fury 9 months ago, just to get her drunk NOW, what a PR stunt (mind you, to look at her who can blame him-she's gorgeous!!!)

No, it's Howard for me, or would be, if I lived in your stinking heap of a country (which I miss SO bad!!!!)

 

[LHC]

the fact that labour has changed constituency boundaries so that the Tories must have a 10% lead on the night to have a majority of 1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

​

This didn't happen; they just removed some scottish constituencies because they were over-represented. Also the tories didn't have a single scottish seat in the house of commons, so they are benefiting from this.

 

[gp32rich]

This didn't happen; they just removed some scottish constituencies because they were over-represented. Also the tories didn't have a single scottish seat in the house of commons, so they are benefiting from this.

​

Yes it did.

I live in one. It used to be a tory safe seat, but the boundaries changed and now it's a labour seat. Don't believe the hype! h34r:


But this time neither are worth voting for.
Labour for Lubidog's reasons of ban this, promote this, think like this, be 'on-message' Media whoring.
And tories for their policy of selling everything to keep taxes down. and the rest


Where is that 'None of these Pricks' Box when you need it? <_<

 

[lubidog]

the fact that labour has changed constituency boundaries so that the Tories must have a 10% lead on the night to have a majority of 1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

​

This didn't happen; they just removed some scottish constituencies because they were over-represented. Also the tories didn't have a single scottish seat in the house of commons, so they are benefiting from this.

​

No, sorry you are completley wrong. And luckily I have the proof....

http://www.ukelect.com/WhatIfConLead/Forecast.htm

This is certainly no tory organisation, but it is a scandal, and one that has been ignored by our press. And it is no accident-this has happened by devious and corrupt government.

I am a floating voter, I could vote for any party with ease. But for this boundary reason I would (if I could ) be voting tory. A vote for the lib dems, even tho 3 party politics is infintely preferable to 2, is a vote for labour.

What else gets my goat, is that when labour members in birmingham have been found vote rigging it hardly warrants any news, but when a tory bloke alters a photo WHOOAAAA!Hold the front press time!!!!

Anyway, after all the labour sleeze, spin and this bloody boundary issue, i think it would be madness to let them in again. Ii remember the last tory days, but that was 8 years ago, were blairs' lot the same as Callaghans'.

BTW I used to work in an area that labour targeted to improve, they were only intrested in giving us money to make it look good, when they had done that they walked away and left us in a mess, the details of it all are shocking-but they trumpeted it as a huge success, and no one of us was allowed to talk to the press about it...

It's worse than mugabes' government sometimes

 

[lubidog]

This didn't happen; they just removed some scottish constituencies because they were over-represented. Also the tories didn't have a single scottish seat in the house of commons, so they are benefiting from this.

​

Yes it did.

I live in one. It used to be a tory safe seat, but the boundaries changed and now it's a labour seat. Don't believe the hype! h34r:


But this time neither are worth voting for.
Labour for Lubidog's reasons of ban this, promote this, think like this, be 'on-message' Media whoring.
And tories for their policy of selling everything to keep taxes down. and the rest


Where is that 'None of these Pricks' Box when you need it? <_<

​

To go on(sorry), you have to vote- you have to hate one bunch more than the other... but as to your points i agree!!!!

i just hate b.liar more than Howard, and as for chaz, ughhh

 

[gp32rich]

What else gets my goat, is that when labour members in birmingham have been found vote rigging it hardly warrants any news, but when a tory bloke alters a photo WHOOAAAA!Hold the front press time!!!!

​

Not just in Birmingham either!

It happened in Jack Straws very own constituency of Blackburn too :rolleyes:
http://www.itv.com/news/britain_523791.html

[edit]And here's one that hasn't been covered up by the spin machine <_<
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/lancashire/4425519.stm

 

[lubidog]

What else gets my goat, is that when labour members in birmingham have been found vote rigging it hardly warrants any news, but when a tory bloke alters a photo WHOOAAAA!Hold the front press time!!!!

​

Not just in Birmingham either!

It happened in Jack Straws very own constituency of Blackburn too :rolleyes:
http://www.itv.com/news/britain_523791.html

​

Yes, and the link you posted doesn't work, flippin labour spies even watching our forum....

 

[gp32rich]

Sorry I googled and didn't check .. here's a working link
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/lancashire/4425519.stm

I'll edit my last post too.


As for disliking one more than the other (There ARE only two options, right?)
I hate them both equally.


But I think it'd be funny to see Chuck dazzled in the headlights when he's PM! :blink:

 

[johncross85]

But I think it'd be funny to see Chuck dazzled in the headlights when he's PM! :blink:

​

Shouldn't that be "Chuck sozzled in the headlights when he's PM!"

J(ohn)

 

[spray]

Got door stepped by our local (tory) MP last night.

We've met face to face twice before, pretty sure she lied when she said she remembered me.

Where i live the only viable option is to vote for the Conservatives, Libdems maybe but they'd have to be some lucky S.O.B.

 

[Klown]

Labour. The only real choice.

 

[PinkSpider]

Labour. The only real choice.

​

With Blair, no. Without yes. - This is how many people are thinking, including me. sigh. Also im not willing to vote for any right wing party ever, that goes against everything I believe in.

 

[markusdragon]

Blair got googlebombed.

Google search

 

[p j]

i wasted my vote on the monster looneys. can i go again?

EDIT: Vote on this site i mean

 

[markusdragon]

I think that involves convincing a mod to take one off the MRLP, and putting it onto whichever of the others you want.

 

[p j]

I think that involves convincing a mod to take one off the MRLP, and putting it onto whichever of the others you want.

​

too...much...effort <Gasp>

 

[firefly1201]

I definatly see the benefits of the MRLP in their manifesto: Clicky