sensible GP32
Well-Known Member
tories.... 4 votes?
"best ozzy impression"
"i love you all, but your fucking mad"
"best ozzy impression"
"i love you all, but your fucking mad"
Well yes, the Nazi's where the National Socialist Party afterall but you got my point?LHC posted on Apr 11 2005 at 10:43 PM said:Actually it's the total opposite.PinkSpider posted on Apr 11 2005 at 09:57 PM said:Dude at thats like what the Nazi's preached.
edit: except the "no children for the poor part", that's just insanity
kknd_cf posted on Apr 11 2005 at 09:23 PM said:I've got to agree with Pinkspider here. If you didn't have poor people who would inhabit the houses built by the other working classes? How would the bigwigs feel then when they have to demolish their houses? How much extra money is that? Who would man the bulldozers? Who would make your food, clean your toliets, order your online games and do every little extra thing that's probably never crossed your mind.
kknd_cf posted on Apr 11 2005 at 09:23 PM said:One of the main arguments for immigration at the moment is Britain's lack of people wanting to be labourers because of lots of people going to university. Do you want labour to decrease that even more so? Because without the little guys the fat guys in the board meetings can't get their coffee.
LHC posted on Apr 11 2005 at 09:43 PM said:except the "no children for the poor part", that's just insanity
PinkSpider posted on Apr 11 2005 at 10:03 PM said:Well yes, the Nazi's where the National Socialist Party afterall but you got my point?LHC posted on Apr 11 2005 at 10:43 PM said:Actually it's the total opposite.PinkSpider posted on Apr 11 2005 at 09:57 PM said:Dude at thats like what the Nazi's preached.
edit: except the "no children for the poor part", that's just insanity
People who don't work will get very little of this value, seeing as they can only claim benefits if they're actively seeking work. Contrary to the middle class view of the world, the majority of the unemployed CANNOT find work, as opposed to not wanting to work. People who don't even bother to look get their dole cut off.the problem i have is with the leeches of society, why should someone who doesnt work be given money? Why should my granddad, who started with nothing at the age of fifteen (just like my grandma) have had to pay 40% tax on some of his earnings in order to pay for someone elses dole money?
Why should the government receive a large part of the value of his house and possessions when he dies? My grandparents have worked fucking hard for this money, people who don't work do not have any entitlement to it.
Why should the amount of money you have have anything to do with basic human rights? Oh, that's right, you're rich enough for this not to affect you :rolleyes:.I strongly believe that poor people should not be allowed to have kids. I was hated for it in our politics debates at school but on the other hand a number of people saw the plain sense in it.
Mark posted on Apr 11 2005 at 07:58 PM said:johncross85 posted on Apr 11 2005 at 07:33 PM said:What I really hate about Labour is that they seem to be turning me into a Tory. A fate worse than death...
Once upon a time I would have always gone for the Lib Dems but they have been so crouded in the middle of late that they are starting to come up with daft policies just to stand out. It used to be that Labour would come up with one stupid idea that would be diametrically oposed by the Torys with another stupid idea and the Lib Dems would come up with a fairly reasonable middle ground idea that didn't make good press but would make good policy. Now they feel compelled to come up with stand-out policies too and all three end up sounding like a bunch of fools.
Were it up to me, I'd add a 'None of these pricks!' option to the ballot papers. If 'None of these pricks!' was the most popular vote we would then shoot every MP in the head and get an entire new batch. At least we would be shut of the current shower who, regardless of who wins in May, we will be stuck with one way or the other for the next 20 years or so.
Some would say that's being harsh...
They'd be wrong.
J(ohn)
It's called abstaining
markusdragon posted on Apr 12 2005 at 04:56 AM said:People who don't work will get very little of this value, seeing as they can only claim benefits if they're actively seeking work. Contrary to the middle class view of the world, the majority of the unemployed CANNOT find work, as opposed to not wanting to work. People who don't even bother to look get their dole cut off.the problem i have is with the leeches of society, why should someone who doesnt work be given money? Why should my granddad, who started with nothing at the age of fifteen (just like my grandma) have had to pay 40% tax on some of his earnings in order to pay for someone elses dole money?
Why should the government receive a large part of the value of his house and possessions when he dies? My grandparents have worked fucking hard for this money, people who don't work do not have any entitlement to it.
And besides, he may have worked fucking hard for his money, but when he dies, he'll be DEAD. It's not like he can enjoy his money any longer, and allowing unrestricted inheritance means that the upper classes will continue to get richer, while the lower classes will continue to get poorer. Did your family earn your grandfather's money? No! So why do you deserve it just because you spawned from him?
I'll be putting something similar ... They're all fucking media whores who polarize opinion so that the middle ground is no choice.finty said:If I had a vote I wouldn't vote, purely because NI politicans are cocks.
It's called 'spoiling your ballot' and is a vote against the systemjohncross said:Were it up to me, I'd add a 'None of these pricks!' option to the ballot papers. If 'None of these pricks!' was the most popular vote we would then shoot every MP in the head and get an entire new batch. At least we would be shut of the current shower who, regardless of who wins in May, we will be stuck with one way or the other for the next 20 years or so.
It's called being a compassionate human being <_<the problem i have is with the leeches of society, why should someone who doesnt work be given money? Why should my granddad, who started with nothing at the age of fifteen (just like my grandma) have had to pay 40% tax on some of his earnings in order to pay for someone elses dole money?
gp32rich posted on Apr 12 2005 at 10:19 AM said:I'll be putting something similar ... They're all fucking media whores who polarize opinion so that the middle ground is no choice.finty said:If I had a vote I wouldn't vote, purely because NI politicans are cocks.
I loathe career politicians. They are not in politics to benefit the country. They are not driven by any beliefs about the good of society.
They make me sick
It's called 'spoiling your ballot' and is a vote against the systemjohncross said:Were it up to me, I'd add a 'None of these pricks!' option to the ballot papers. If 'None of these pricks!' was the most popular vote we would then shoot every MP in the head and get an entire new batch. At least we would be shut of the current shower who, regardless of who wins in May, we will be stuck with one way or the other for the next 20 years or so.
If my one vote really counted I'd use it for what I beleive, but at the moment I believe that none of them are worth voting for. If 'Jedi' can be added to the last Census (link here) I'm sure that there can be a 'none of these pricks' option added to ballot papers :>
It's called being a compassionate human being <_<the problem i have is with the leeches of society, why should someone who doesnt work be given money? Why should my granddad, who started with nothing at the age of fifteen (just like my grandma) have had to pay 40% tax on some of his earnings in order to pay for someone elses dole money?
moz posted on Apr 12 2005 at 12:09 PM said:gp32rich posted on Apr 12 2005 at 10:19 AM said:I'll be putting something similar ... They're all fucking media whores who polarize opinion so that the middle ground is no choice.finty said:If I had a vote I wouldn't vote, purely because NI politicans are cocks.
I loathe career politicians. They are not in politics to benefit the country. They are not driven by any beliefs about the good of society.
They make me sick
It's called 'spoiling your ballot' and is a vote against the systemjohncross said:Were it up to me, I'd add a 'None of these pricks!' option to the ballot papers. If 'None of these pricks!' was the most popular vote we would then shoot every MP in the head and get an entire new batch. At least we would be shut of the current shower who, regardless of who wins in May, we will be stuck with one way or the other for the next 20 years or so.
If my one vote really counted I'd use it for what I beleive, but at the moment I believe that none of them are worth voting for. If 'Jedi' can be added to the last Census (link here) I'm sure that there can be a 'none of these pricks' option added to ballot papers :>
It's called being a compassionate human being <_<the problem i have is with the leeches of society, why should someone who doesnt work be given money? Why should my granddad, who started with nothing at the age of fifteen (just like my grandma) have had to pay 40% tax on some of his earnings in order to pay for someone elses dole money?
40% tax is a fucker though, i turned down a promotion at work becuase of this.
boss: well done youve got a promotion youve a pay rasie of £9000, obviously there will be more work and stress envolved
me "i already earn more money than i need, why would i need more stress for an extra £100 a week, no thank you"
scrap welfare benefits and don't ban the poor from having children problem solvedspray posted on Apr 11 2005 at 11:44 PM said:why is this insanity? if people without jobs have no children to support then less money is needed by social security. if these people have no children then there are less people growing up already in poverty. it just baffles me that people already on welfare can logically be allowed to have/have more kids.
johncross85 posted on Apr 12 2005 at 09:25 AM said:I don't want to have to vote for the party that I don't want in power the least.
J(ohn)
yawnLHC posted on Apr 12 2005 at 03:51 PM said:scrap welfare benefits and don't ban the poor from having children problem solvedspray posted on Apr 11 2005 at 11:44 PM said:why is this insanity? if people without jobs have no children to support then less money is needed by social security. if these people have no children then there are less people growing up already in poverty. it just baffles me that people already on welfare can logically be allowed to have/have more kids.