directive0
Very Active Member
I swear, only on this forum can a topic be so royally derailed.
It's kind of beautiful.
It's kind of beautiful.
Why did you do that? I thought I broke my headphones!
evidence points to the contrary, but you are entitled to your opinion...Humans and true dinosaurs obviously never coexisted
I expect reputable sources for all of this by tomorrow. Peer reviewed and such.evidence points to the contrary, but you are entitled to your opinion...
- human foot with dinosaur in limebed
- Ica stones (with sawtooth dorsal spine, only recently confirmed to be true)
- Legends that describe, what can now be reconstructed as Dino's (from different places around the world. Some actually in our lifetime. African was shown different dino's and was able to identify it)
- Dinosaurs found with non-fossilized blood, i.e. some DNA was recoverable... cant be too old, then.
I carry my Pandora.Wait... YOU don't carry a Linux disk around at all times? (Rescatux, a life Knoppix or OpenELEC or BERT?) Then what do you carry? Swiss knife? Screwdriver set? Portable Fire (lighter)? Medikit (band-aid)? Chewing gum (for when you forgot to brush your teeth)? safety needle? laserpointer? An elastic? a napkin? not even a Zombie Apocalypse Survival Kit?
Why did you do that? I thought I broke my headphones!
Geologic evidence AFAIK puts the extinction of most of land dinosaurs (flying types evolved into birds or went extinct as well) at the end of Cretaceous period of the Mesozoic era. First humanish apes came late in a period that started about 40 million years after that, in the Neogene period of the Cenozoic era. There is some evidence that tiny numbers of land dinosaurs made it to the beginning of the Paleocene period of the Cenozoic era, but even those are still roughly 65 million years from the first even remotely humanish apes.Why did you do that? I thought I broke my headphones!
evidence points to the contrary, but you are entitled to your opinion...
- human foot with dinosaur in limebed
- Ica stones (with sawtooth dorsal spine, only recently confirmed to be true)
- Legends that describe, what can now be reconstructed as Dino's (from different places around the world. Some actually in our lifetime. African was shown different dino's and was able to identify it)
- Dinosaurs found with non-fossilized blood, i.e. some DNA was recoverable... cant be too old, then.
wikipedia said:Some of the tracks were fake, carved by locals to sell during the Great Depression. These footprints do not represent the way human footprints would look in mud; they also do not accurately reflect the changes in the way giant humans would walk as a result of their size. Other footprints were genuine tracks, but showed features inconsistent with human footprints. Supporters of the human footprint theory claimed that the tracks showed authentic mud “push-ups” and that the time period for the human and dinosaur trackways had to be the same as the trails intersected. In 1986, Glen Kuban conducted research on the trackways. He found that most tracks formed a wide “V” at the end and showed grooves in places that were not consistent with those in a human footprint. Kuban determined that the tracks were made by bipedal dinosaurs with three toes. These particular tracks showed the dinosaur walking on the soles of its feet rather than on its toes, as is usually found in tracks. Evidence based in human anatomy also refutes the claim that the footprints are of human origin. The foot length measurements were used to calculate approximate heights of the humans; the pace and stride lengths do not match these calculated heights, making it highly unlikely that the tracks are human in origin. The measurements do fit the known values for bipedal dinosaurs.
wikipedia said:In 1973, during an interview with Erich von Däniken, Uschuya stated he had faked the stones that he had sold. In 1975 Uschuya and another farmer named Irma Gutierrez de Aparcana confirmed that they had forged the stones they gave to Cabrera by copying the images from comic books, text books and magazines. Later, Uschuya recanted the forging story during an interview with a German journalist, saying that he had claimed they were a hoax to avoid imprisonment for selling archaeological artifacts. In 1977, during the BBC documentary Pathway to the Gods, Uschuya produced an Ica stone with a dentist's drill and claimed to have produced a fake patina by baking the stone in cow dung. That same year, another BBC documentary was released with a skeptical analysis of Cabrera's stones, and the new-found attention to the phenomenon prompted Peruvian authorities to arrest Uschuya, as Peruvian law prohibits the sale of archaeological discoveries. Uschuya recanted his claim that he had found them and instead admitted they were hoaxes, saying "Making these stones is easier than farming the land." He engraved the stones using images in books and magazines as examples and knives, chisels and a dental drill. He also said that he had not made all the stones. He was not punished, and continued to sell similar stones to tourists as trinkets. The stones continued to be made and carved by other artists as forgeries of the original forgeries.
[hatred]
Ica stones have been faked a lot. They can't be reliably dated, making them easy pickings for forgery.
Then come sit by the fire... it's cold at night and it's fun being around such diverse people like yourselves...his thread is a garbage fire.
...and ignore the smell.Then come sit by the fire... it's cold at night and it's fun being around such diverse people like yourselves...
As in the days of Noach, so shall the end of times be... welcome to the End of Days...sexually perverted, power obsessed delinquents who have no conscience to speak of...
Can't do that, I mean, parts and pieces are your own human-self, and that will bite you (in the persona, not the ego, so it will extra hurt). When that does, here's an exercise:I hate everything that makes them what they are...
clever and special
.... and try to stay up-wind......and ignore the smell.
Ha, I know this one and did it quite a few times when I was a kid (and seldomly later on).Can't do that, I mean, parts and pieces are your own human-self, and that will bite you (in the persona, not the ego, so it will extra hurt). When that does, here's an exercise:
Sit down on a quiet spot. Hands with palm up. Choose a hand that you will gather all things you like about yourself. Concentrate all thing you like about yourself on top of that hand. Now do the same for the other hand, but concentrate on putting all the things you do not like about yourself there. Now, slowly join both hands. If done correctly, there will be a rejection to join them. Slowly and gently keep pushing your hands together. It is now up to you to decide: Either do not contaminate these two chi balls. Or mingle them.
Then come sit by the fire... it's cold at night and it's fun being around such diverse people like yourselves...
Did you solve the "odd one out"? Did you see which one was the "special" one? I loved it when I saw it.
As for me, I don't get along with humans IRL, but I could never hate humanity as a whole because of two innocent and brilliant things it does create all the time and are vastly underrated by human flocks and their sick power hungry leaders:
music and games