Ok, so we want to do what debian does. I 100% agree, but lets do it
the debian way.
Where does any of those go from there with versions and numbers, its ok with numbers, but thats revisions(?)
What we can learn from debian is that a name works regardless, no need to get supernerdy about it. If names from toy-story work, then surely it doesnt have to make sense for every esoteric reason there is.
My suggestion is making it a destinct, trademarkable name, that nobody else will use, and have a shorter form of it, where it is dragonbox (already established) used in everyday lingo.
Im not even on the barricades on it being _my_ suggestion, just something that makes a bit of sense, please.
Or point out the flaws in that, thoughts, etc.
Its a company with in the forseeable future one product, voting over names without asking the ones that own them, or finding out what they mean to people that speak the language they are in seems like a hasted decision. This is a foss endavour, taking the name of other foss operating systems without using them is bad-mannered. More debian, less ubuntu please.
In the words of eazy-e: "eazy dus it"
