@Grench
Lets see
1) the fullstop normally on the right of the M key on the right side. Is now on the left of the Z key on the other side of the keyboard.
2) the comma normally on the right of the M key on the right side. Is now on the left of the Z key on the other side of the keyboard
3) the "<" normally on the right of the M key on the right side. Is now on the left of the Z key on the other side of the keyboard
4) the ">" normally on the right of the M key on the right side. Is now on the left of the Z key on the other side of the keyboard
5) the "/" normally on the right of the M key on the right side. Is now on the left of the Z key on the other side of the keyboard
6) the ";" normally on the right of the M key on the right side. Is now on the left of the Z key on the other side of the keyboard
7) "=" and "-" where on the top row of keys on the right side next to "0", now they are on the bottom row on the left side oin the Z and X keys.
8) "?" is on the A key rather than on the right side of the keyboard rather than next to shift on the right side, It's also on a different row than normal
9) the ' and " keys, again on the opposite side of the keyboard to where they are meant to be
10) the + key normally on the top row , on the far right. Is now on the left side on the S key.
etc etc
And so on and so forth. Sure, if there are pairs they are generally together but they are nowhere near their proper placement. The placement of the punctuation and symbol keys are all in non standard and often completely opposite positions - the exception being the symbols etc on the number keys. If you use a standard keyboard and then use the Pyra KB, then a large number of the symbol and punctuation keys are not anywhere near where they are meant to be. Which is the issue I'm referring to. As I said, I understand why that is and except the trade off for why it was done. But it is still a negative.