I was just wondering: why do most of you want touch screen? At first I thought "Wow, it has touch screen?" But after awhile I came to realize that I don't really need it, and that it basically is just an extra cost for me.
I still think it's nice to have, but mainly because it's something exotic and something to show-off. Furthermore, we could use one of the analog sticks as a "mouse", which would be almost as good, and certainly sufficient enough.
I am going to be using a Targus mini-laptop mouse, it will look really good (and confuse people even more in regard to the Pandora's size)
QUOTE
I think drawing is the main thing that you can't do with analog pad. But what other uses are there? Exclude DS emulation, because that may not happen... I think in some thread I saw someone mention some game or application, but I'm not sure. But still, we surely aren't taking it for just few certain tasks, are we?
Text recognition, very important. And Emulation or ports of graphical games. ScummVM comes to mind, I would use a stylus for that.
QUOTE
Of course, if the cost difference is negligible, then why not? But I would assume it's not that small of a difference...
I have heard $13 or less, the touchscreen interface is already integrated into the processor, and the screen has the touch capability, I think it helps to have a general level of hardware across all units from the start.
QUOTE
ps. Before anybody says something about GUI, I personally prefer not to whip out the pen everytime I want to do something with the device. I hope it will at least have the option of doing things without touch screen. Maybe even disable the touch sensing to save some battery? (Probably won't save that much though...)