Dodging the question regarding your incorrect analysis as usual...
Then we are done. If you cannot be a man and concede when your logic is faulty and your conclusions therefore stupid, you are an irrational human being.
I have proven it, your poll is categorically rigged against microSD because you can vote more times for SD than you can for microSD. Therefore your conclusion that you can merely sum the counts in each category is wrong. This is trivial analysis, I am surprised at how much difficulty you exhibit in understanding it.
You can't admit defeat on that point, so instead you redirect the conversation, as I now redirect my attention to more rational affairs.
Good day.
You're twisting that poll to suit your need to attack me.
There are 12 options from which people may, "Choose as many as you would find as acceptable outcomes."
There are 4 different options presented for internal memory. On board NAND, microSD, SD and none.
There are 3 different options for external memory. microSD, SD and none.
One of the 12 choices is on board NAND only and no slots.
One of the 12 choices is, 'same as the existing Pandora + bigger on board NAND' - and it got 20% of the response.
In fact, of the possibilities, only SIX options included ANY provision for an internal card slot.
Of the SIX options that included ANY provision for an internal card slot, microSD was given FOUR of them.
So, if you REALLY want to consider that poll rigged, with response to internal media choice it is rigged in microSD's favor.
Now, if you want to get into actual statistics, you'll realize that neither of these polls has enough respondents to actually gain statistical relevancy. In Sociology you can refer to small sample polls like this as 'directional' in nature as they do show trends - but are inadequate to prove causality.
Would you like to go back to actually understanding usage cases for configurations now instead of 'how polls work'?
