atomicthumbs
I am the king of the collectors, with hospital bed
if I wanted android I would buy a phone
dflemstr said:Oh and guys don't forget that Android still runs on Linux. It's not a completely new OS we're talking about.
Software quality and stability. The Pandora distribution, derived from Ångström as it is, has serious serious issues, and will continue to have issues for a long long time.Prometheus said:Why is losing the ability to use the device as the miniature computer that it is, in favour of using something that seems to primarily be aimed at mobile telephones, a great thing, though? Am I missing something?
dflemstr said:Software quality and stability. The Pandora distribution, derived from Ångström as it is, has serious serious issues, and will continue to have issues for a long long time.Prometheus said:Why is losing the ability to use the device as the miniature computer that it is, in favour of using something that seems to primarily be aimed at mobile telephones, a great thing, though? Am I missing something?
The phone functionality is an optional component in the system. Several android-based tablets are going to appear later this year.Prometheus said:I'm afraid I haven't encountered any issues with quality or stability, so I can't comment on that. I still don't see what advantage using something apparently aimed at mobile telephones has.
I wasn't aware of that. Thanks for the info.dflemstr said:The phone functionality is an optional component in the system.
So I suppose this would benefit all of those people who are using their Pandora as a tablet?Several android-based tablets are going to appear later this year.
I see.(OH and I'm playing the devils advocate for the sake of this thread, if you haven't realized yet)
And some are already out.dflemstr said:The phone functionality is an optional component in the system. Several android-based tablets are going to appear later this year.Prometheus said:I'm afraid I haven't encountered any issues with quality or stability, so I can't comment on that. I still don't see what advantage using something apparently aimed at mobile telephones has.
dflemstr said:Software quality and stability. The Pandora distribution, derived from Ångström as it is, has serious serious issues, and will continue to have issues for a long long time.
Maybe don't?dflemstr said:(OH and I'm playing the devils advocate for the sake of this thread, if you haven't realized yet)Prometheus said:I'm afraid I haven't encountered any issues with quality or stability, so I can't comment on that. I still don't see what advantage using something apparently aimed at mobile telephones has.
DaveC said:That was what I was wondering kind of before. If/when Craig decides to go to android does that mean the community has to? Couldn't we continue on here as is and let him sell those to whoever he is thinking wants android Pandoras?Natasha said:I'm joining in the no-way-I-let-Android-run-on-my-Pandora crowd. I was planning to try help port FreeBSD (or should that fail, another BSD) as a side activity soon after getting my unit, however should Android be the only choice I'd rather have a brick until I can get a BSD working on it.
Now I don't have anything against a multi-boot Android option along with a real OS, or an Android compatibility layer on top of the real Linux, or whatever optional androidity that doesn't prevent coding for a real architecture and using efficient native applications.
I am assuming the hardware is the same so nothing would prevent it.
Xfce and Minimenu are interfaces, rather than operating systems, though. I don't think it would be that simple, especially since Android's kernel is, as far as I gather, derived from Linux, rather than actually being a Linux kernel.greendots said:Shouldn't it be possible to switch between Android and XFCE just like it is to switch between Minimenu and XFCE now? Android is certainly more to load but with a compatable kernel I dont see the issue.
What? doesn't android just magically load onto the Pandora right from the google website and automatically interface with all of the Pandora SD cards, sound, controls, ports, screen, battery and everything?sinoth said:Not sure why people think Android will make these issues go away. Just because Google does work on the main OS doesn't mean the grunts (us!) won't get stuck plugging all the holes for our platform. Hell, Android still doesn't run on my phone without serious issues, and it has a SuperMegaCorp backing it
I am no dev but I would think they would rather have the current linux environment with the desktop OS etc than some phone interface. How would some devs that like to actually edit code etc on the Pandora like doing that with a phone type interface with layers of java and crap cluttering things up?Natasha said:Seeing this thread I strongly doubt the community has a whole would follow our way. My guess is that it would end up with a split into pandroid and other(s?) communities, with the ratio depending on how well android performs. But unless a huge majority end up in the same community, the split would only weaken every side, which would be a lose for everybody.
I'd go as far as thinking such a split would be so detrimental it's a reason good enough to be extremely cautious in a potential Android attempt, no matter how technically superior (or equal) it might be.
second exodous said:Google is a search company, they don't make money on anything else. Microsoft is an OS company, they don't make money one anything else. These two companies make so much on what they focus on they don't need to make money on anything else.
Google IS NOT making money on Android, it's an experiment like XBOX.