MWeston
Internal Development
I am seeing a good 300mA being drawn from the i.MX31 while in run mode with many of the clocks enabled. The PMIC is fairly dormant still and will probably add at least another 30mA when being utilized and audio blasting out of it (headphone...speaker would be much, much more). That is at 3.3V input to the system, no LCD on, no TV encoder running and excluding any sort of USB/WiFi/Networking hardware active.JyCet said:What is the estimation for system with i.MX31 ?
Someone know if ARM Cortex-A8 (65nm) need 300mW @ 600MHz or 1GHz ?
ARM11 need 0.6mW/MHz (130nm) but i.mx31 is in 90nm and freescale write 40% energy save from 130nm to 90nm :s
If so, I suppose AMR11 core of iMX31 need around 192mW @ 532MHz
Edit:
funny ARM920 core need 192mW @ 240MHz
(0.8mW/MHz in 180nm)
You can see that is getting close to 1W and it is not reasonable to compare one core to another core. I could assume 500mW is coming from the ARM11 core and I would also consider the OMAP3430 to be about the same (just speculation). The real difference will come from all the peripherals running and how they are gated as required.
I would think that the two chips will be very similar in power consumption. You have the 90nm i.MX31 with 532MHz clock and a 66MHz 3D engine versus a 60nm 550MHz(?) OMAP3430 with a 137MHz(??? <--speculation here) 3D engine. Under "normal" usage I think they will be similar in power consumption. Running at maximum, the OMAP will use more power but it has some features that are internal to the chip that need to be external on the i.MX31 design (USB PYH x2, Video encoder) which may reduce power requirements and probably put them back at the same level again.
I think worrying about battery life between these two processors is a wasted concern but one can only speculate at this point.
Last edited by a moderator: