Saber
Advanced Member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2012
- Messages
- 1,303
Shocking.I honestly do believe we're making a mountain out of a mole hill here.
People never ever do that sort of thing on this forum.
Shocking.I honestly do believe we're making a mountain out of a mole hill here.
Because of thisHow is situation 2 worse than situation 1? And situation 2 is basically a worst case scenario, at least some cables will never progress far enough to break the redundancy. So as near as I can tell, outside of a few extra cents for wider cables, the redundancy is strictly better: those that would have broken either get more usage or never notice that anything is wrong.
Shouldn't the real question be is why the LCD cable wearing out in the first place?
There is a subscribe button on http://www.pyra-handheld.com/Is there a webpage which counts interested buyers?
All peoples who are interested in buying a Pyra could register.
I think it would be helpfull if Evildragon could see how many pieces he will sell.
How would that affect flexibility and possible bend radius ?Is it possible that the traces on Pyra's cable can also be made thicker? Does that make any sense as an additional mitigation tactic?
Big talk from someone whos good looking calfs alone are bigger than a mole hill.I honestly do believe we're making a mountain out of a mole hill here.
That's the part that doesn't make sense to me. If the cable never breaks because of redundancy why does it matter? If it breaks six months later why does that prevent you from questioning why it's wearing out? Nothing is lost by adding the redundancy, only gained.I still don't see why redundancy isn't better. If there's a problem and they're going to break then they are going to break, and if an extra few pennies gets a few more months out of them then I figure that's money well spent, and if the redundancy actually prevents them from breaking at all then it's definitely money well spent.Because of thisHow is situation 2 worse than situation 1? And situation 2 is basically a worst case scenario, at least some cables will never progress far enough to break the redundancy. So as near as I can tell, outside of a few extra cents for wider cables, the redundancy is strictly better: those that would have broken either get more usage or never notice that anything is wrong.Shouldn't the real question be is why the LCD cable wearing out in the first place?
Oh you smooth talker you.Big talk from someone whos good looking calfs alone are bigger than a mole hill.
https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-best-electrical-wires-those-with-fine-threads-or-those-with-thicker-threads?share=1How would that affect flexibility and possible bend radius
The resistance per unit length is inversely proportional to the cross section of the copper. So, as wire gets heavier (thicker) the resistance goes down. So thinner gauge wire has a higher resistance per unit length than thicker wire. Stranded wire is used because it is much more pliable and flexible over it's length than solid wire and the more wire strands inside a wire bundle, the more flexible and stronger the wire is.
Well in the case of the Pandora LCD cables the original cables were breaking within a few months of use and there are still some signs of it breaking today even with a more durable cable. It's one thing to say "shit happens" and another to investigate why the "shit happens" and to plan ahead to prevent the shit from happening in the future devices.seriously that whole redundancy obsession is getting ridiculous..... we use redundancy in countless scenarios everywhere, and the only real reason to it is "shit happens" ,
every mecanical system is prone to wear and then failure, the LCD cable is located in a highly mobile area, therefore it is reasonnable to plan ahead , it's a case of the age old "better safe than sorry"
I guess I have a problem owning a device "knowing" (or at least heaving the impression) it has a design flaw in it, and instead of doing something to remove the cause only the symptoms are treated...That's the part that doesn't make sense to me. If the cable never breaks because of redundancy why does it matter? If it breaks six months later why does that prevent you from questioning why it's wearing out? Nothing is lost by adding the redundancy, only gained.
I still don't see why redundancy isn't better. If there's a problem and they're going to break then they are going to break, and if an extra few pennies gets a few more months out of them then I figure that's money well spent, and if the redundancy actually prevents them from breaking at all then it's definitely money well spent.
Are they actually good looking ? I'm interest in a strange way:blink:Oh you smooth talker you.
Mind explaning the connection to my question a bit ?The resistance per unit length is inversely proportional to the cross section of the copper. So, as wire gets heavier (thicker) the resistance goes down. So thinner gauge wire has a higher resistance per unit length than thicker wire. Stranded wire is used because it is much more pliable and flexible over it's length than solid wire and the more wire strands inside a wire bundle, the more flexible and stronger the wire is.
So sad it had only two moths till retirementBut what if I get shot in the LCD cable? What if i want to play pikmin with my last dying breath.
I've never tried pikmin, but that might be some kind of shit that i want to do there and then. And if it doesnt work, well at least I had a chance.
I HAD A CHANCE. DONT PURPLE ON ME NOW DAMMIT!
I assume there are for the bug collections.So sad it had only two moths till retirement
The only way you'd prevent issues with the cable is to remove the hinge, and make it like the Nintendo 2DS. (or find a way to transmit signals contact-less, I guess)I guess I have a problem owning a device "knowing" (or at least heaving the impression) it has a design flaw in it, and instead of doing something to remove the cause only the symptoms are treated...
Sadly the mipi cable option cannot work... However probably even such a cable would be under quite some repeptitive stress.The only way you'd prevent issues with the cable is to remove the hinge, and make it like the Nintendo 2DS. (or find a way to transmit signals contact-less, I guess)I guess I have a problem owning a device "knowing" (or at least heaving the impression) it has a design flaw in it, and instead of doing something to remove the cause only the symptoms are treated...
If you want to keep the clamshell, you're going to have to accept that there is *always* going to be the possibility.
hmm.. I gotta stop posting too late... not sure myself what I wanted to point out.Mind explaning the connection to my question a bit ?
Depending on how the hinge(s) will look like, routing the cable directly from the board to the screen could still be an option (much like IBM/Lenovo did it in the past)The only way you'd prevent issues with the cable is to remove the hinge, and make it like the Nintendo 2DS. (or find a way to transmit signals contact-less, I guess)
If you want to keep the clamshell, you're going to have to accept that there is *always* going to be the possibility.
I've got some unfortunate news for you: everything you own has a flaw. Every product ever produced in mass quantities has a greater than zero failure rate. The best anyone can do is design around the flaws and hope for the best. There is not a product in your house that isn't a ticking timebomb with some (sometimes extremely low) probability that it will fail: electronics wear out; batteries inflate; oven safe glass spontaneously shatter when heated; Pandora cables break.I guess I have a problem owning a device "knowing" (or at least heaving the impression) it has a design flaw in it, and instead of doing something to remove the cause only the symptoms are treated...
Oh sorry then I misinterpreted some of your earlier posts.What the heck is a MIPI cable?