mali
-
^You work at McDonalds? Interesting
I lied, I'm unemployed.... and homeless...mali said:^You work at McDonalds? Interesting
mali said:^You work at McDonalds? Interesting
jb0yx said:I lied, I'm unemployed.... and homeless...mali said:^You work at McDonalds? Interesting
There's a big difference between developing an OS and patching say security holes, and adding odd features, etc.skeezix said:strider_mt2k said:Still developing the OS? :blink:
Wow.
1) Is an OS ever done? You think they're not still developing for Windows XP what, nearly a decade since it was originaly planned for release?
2) You go build your own distribution and customize nearly everything, in your spare time, for free
jeff
Nova said:Before you make any snap judgments based on that occupation, don't forget that in this financial climate, anyone who has any job at all is lucky to have it. Don't be a job snob.
No, that would be prohibitively expensive and no plastics manufacturer would agree to it. The produce/tweak iteration you mention is what was supposed to have been going on over the past 6 months, and they did up 5 to 10 at a time, not 1000. This 1000 should not have any tweaks needed to be done to it, and if it does, they would need to go back to the small runs in the demo machine, not 1000 more production quality cases. No, this 1000 is supposed to be as close to perfect as they can get. The only reason they're getting 1000 and not the full 10000 is because they are paranoid, and rightly so, after the last sample we saw. Just because it should be perfect doesn't mean it will be once the finish is applied.zounder1 said:I disagree completely. The first 1000 will be a production run that will establish what is an acceptable product in fit and finish. Once you have that benchmark you can tell the factory that any units not meeting the quality of the first batch will not be accepted and, more importantly, not paid for. Maybe there will be a few tweaks required after the first 1000. Then another batch of 1000 will likely be made. Repeat the process until you hit a final production quality - then that is used as the benchmark going forward.
It's a trapbarnesy said:Ooh, they do food now?
I think it's always been rude, I'm just suddenly pointing it out in my own special way.mindlord said:[rant about how it's suddenly become rude to have an opinion about anything around here]
[/rant about how it's suddenly become rude to have an opinion about anything around here]Lack of experience does not preclude any of us from forming an opinion. Right or wrong, educated guess or not. I would like to state for the record that I was not suggesting directly to the Open Pandora team to take any course of action over another. It was a statement of advisement, which could be used by anyone on the team if they decide to heed it. Not a demand.
I expressed my opinion of a situation and marked a stance of agreement with Nation.A.List's opinion. Furthermore, my opinion of this situation is not based on the need for knowledge of plastics manufacturing or even cake baking. Based on the track record we've observed with this particular company, with information provided to us. Whether they make plastic cases, bake cakes, or pressure wash toilet seats is inconsequential to the subject at hand. Facts are facts. They have demonstrated time and again that OPLtd is very low on their list of priorities, and have no reservations about putting this project on the back burner in favor of bigger clients. They also have demonstrated that do so to make room for customers who haven't already paid them in full.
It doesn't take a professional team leader, or businessman, or even a high-school graduate to see that finally - Open Pandora Ltd, has their attention at this moment, and would be wise to take every measure to ensure that attention is not given the opportunity to be directed elsewhere.
My post was more about the suggestion to use the 1000 cases as if they were the samples to be tweaked than whether the 1000 should be checked first. I agree, these 1000 should be checked before accepting the next 9000, but expecting them to crank out 1000 for each flaw is madness. If they'd done that from the start, we'd already have wasted 3000 cases (well, 2000. Supposedly the third batch could have worked)mali said:@WizardStan
That's not the full story. They skipped the larger testing runs and so these 1k should be checked first.
I'll be amazed the 22:nd if the cases have arrived by then.craigix said:Why aren't you all amazed that they are going to meet the 22nd March deadline?
craigix said:Why aren't you all amazed that they are going to meet the 22nd March deadline?
Six months of them saying they'll meet a certain deadline only to have it pass by have crushed our souls into a fine paste?craigix said:Why aren't you all amazed that they are going to meet the 22nd March deadline?
craigix said:Why aren't you all amazed that they are going to meet the 22nd March deadline?