I didn't say it was globally irrelevant. I am saying that is his position, and even if it wasn't his position, he still didn't answer the thread in those two posts that followed. Not every new device has specs at the top of the charts, you made this point yourself. So Craig's Zen response of "why does anyone advance" does not logically address the question. And my use of "bleeding edge" is irrelevant to this point. I am not clarifying this for you anymore.Bismouth you can't use bleeding edge as your argument and support it by a link to what Craigix said then turn around and say it's not relevant. You just can't do that.
You do have troubles understanding me, and while you did post good arguments they are quotes of what he has said and people have either disagreed with or found unsatisfactory. If they are logically satisfactory then Craig can just link to your post and be done with it.
But the bottom line here: you're overextending my argumentation into the guts of the matter. I don't know enough to argue this SoC versus that, or bleeding edge versus good enough. I came in on a point of process, and I will leave on that note as well.
Last edited by a moderator: