Imagine, Apple would make such an Handheld Device with a M1 SoC...
The device would be locked to Apple software.
It had no SD-card slot and a single USC-C port.
It would cost 1500€ or more.
Dock would cost 200€.
No, thanks.
Imagine, Apple would make such an Handheld Device with a M1 SoC...
Sure, the high costs of the Tiger Lake may reflect the poor yield of Intels 10nm process. They still have trouble to get this working afaik.There are other costs to take into account such as the R&D, the software development, the QA, etc.
Even for the manufacturing cost itself, it can get complex: the cost for making a single chip can be low, but if you need to retool all your factories to make them e it'll actually be more costly. It also depends on your quality: if only 50% of your chips are good enough to pass QA, your actual cost will be twice the cost of a single chip.
True. But imagine someone "not Apple" could get it's hands onto the M1. Think about the possibilities!The device would be locked to Apple software.
It had no SD-card slot and a single USC-C port.
It would cost 1500€ or more.
Dock would cost 200€.
No, thanks.
How. Apple as far as I know haven't bought any founadaries, at least not any that are making 5nm bits and pieces. That means they need to sign a contract with a public foundary, pay them, send them the blueprints and let the go and make the parts. There's a possibility of corporate espionage to get those blueprints out, but I doubt anyone with a position to maintain would touch parts made from those with a large bargepole.True. But imagine someone "not Apple" could get it's hands onto the M1. Think about the possibilities!
I did not thought about illegal espionage stuff or anything like that. But it would be great if there is a affordable and public available ARM based SoC chip with comparable power like Apples recent M1. Even half that power would be great in an Handheld device, right? ^^How. Apple as far as I know haven't bought any founadaries, at least not any that are making 5nm bits and pieces. That means they need to sign a contract with a public foundary, pay them, send them the blueprints and let the go and make the parts. There's a possibility of corporate espionage to get those blueprints out, but I doubt anyone with a position to maintain would touch parts made from those with a large bargepole.
....It’s possible that GPD could improve the typing experience somewhat through software or firmware updates. But without switching to physical keys that actually move, there’s only so much the company can do to make typing on the Win 3 comfortable. It’s clearly a device that was not designed for entering a lot of text or playing games that require keyboard and mouse input. ,,,,,
Imagine, ED would have made a Kickstarter/Indiegogo campaign... $$$$1Million USD raised in the first 7 hours with over 1000 backers
But imagine, how many "when is it finally finished", "this project is a scam", "The Pyra's 3D acceleration is broken! I want my money back!" users we would get in our communityImagine, ED would have made a Kickstarter/Indiegogo campaign... $$$
Depends on how more money would have speed up the entire Pyra production, I guess. ^^"But imagine, how many "when is it finally finished", "this project is a scam", "The Pyra's 3D acceleration is broken! I want my money back!" users we would get in our community
This is the definitive answer. The Pyra project could have been literally destroyed forever.But imagine, how many "when is it finally finished", "this project is a scam", "The Pyra's 3D acceleration is broken! I want my money back!" users we would get in our community
Don't forget: Crowdfunding Folks are experienced in suffering...This is the definitive answer. The Pyra project could have been literally destroyed forever.