Nintendo
Nintendo Switch
My bad specs where wrote up when dual soc experiment was tried fixed it now
I noticed that, thanks for fixing.
My bad specs where wrote up when dual soc experiment was tried fixed it now
^ That's what struck me when I looked at the specs. It's a shame to see the same old 320x240 resolution on such a capable looking machine. I recall a very old thread where Craig mentioned one of the original ideas for the Pandora was 640x480, but the LCDs were too hard to source. Don't know if that's still the case.
Yeah, 640x480 would be the go.
For Dosbox 640x480 would be useful. Also, many PS1 and N64 games produce text that is unreadable on 320x240 screens.
The advantage of 640x480 is that you can simply 2x scale games that best fit into 320x240, giving the exact same look and fit (just like we do on the Pandora). But you also have the extra resolution on tap for DOSBox as gibberish mentioned, along with all sorts of Linux ports and all the usual Windows classics - Doom, Quake, Warcraft, Free Heroes, UrQuan, etc etc. If (getting hypothetical) Qemu happened to be ported and running well, think Fallout, Starcraft, Diablo etc.
We've seen a lot of these things on GPH and Dingoo handhelds, always compromised by the low resolution.
The Playstation supported resolutions from 256x224 up to 640x480. If the game is using the lower resolution there should be no problem rendering it to a 320x240 screen. I suspect that if people notice enough to actually complain about the fonts on a 320x240 display as if it were normal, that most games run at the 640x480 resolution. That's just a guess though; I've never played a game in emulation that ran at 320x240 so I don't know.Very interesting that at native resolution text would be garbled in the emulators for a few games. :mellow:
Any GPU should be able to do automatic hardware scaling, like the Pandora's OMAP. Render a scene at 320x240 and it is displayed to the 640x480 screen (or 800x480 in the Pandora's case) at no extra cost. Well, a little extra battery cost since it ultimately needs to power 4 times as many pixels, but that's a fairly minor cost compared to everything else in a system.This resolution is beneficial because most of the software for OD is already designed for a screen with a resolution of 320x240 pixels. Scaling it to a higher resolution might actually decrease the performance. Not that I mind seeing the device having a better screen than it currently has.
I will talk with hardware devs about changing the lcd screen to a 640x480 or 800x600. Now my next question I'm considering taking deposits for half the value of the GCW Zero and about two weeks from release I will submit a receipt for the balance of the device for 100 lucky people this will be an upgraded model with 512mb of ram versus the standard 256mb the device will ship with. Give me your thoughts on this please???
I would say 3 weeks as it will probably take me a week to box them and ship them out after the two weeks notice and that would be contigent on the remaining balance being paid hehehehehehe....