iprice
Certified Guru
I don't disagree, but trying to work out who best to donate to and prioritising the list of who does and who doesn't get a machine, with the available funds, will be a really shitty (and time consuming) job. Most people donating don't pick or choose who should get a Pandora, or how the money is used, but it is their money so perhaps it really is their choice. However, donations don't usually work like that. When you give to charity, you don't get to choose who actually benefits. Obviously this is VERY different.
People are going to be left high and dry and I don't disagree that the Pandora needs more users that are productive and visible and benefit the community. However until users have machines it's difficult to know how productive or visible etc. they will be. Of course it is possible to develop Pandora apps without a Pandora, as I'm sure many of us have done. Testing is problematic, but not impossible. But again just because you can prove that you can do these things for the community doesn't mean that you will when the time comes.
ED has done a sterling job, but obviously he can't continue doing what he has been doing. So perhaps there does need to be a way now of working out how best to move on from this.
People are going to be left high and dry and I don't disagree that the Pandora needs more users that are productive and visible and benefit the community. However until users have machines it's difficult to know how productive or visible etc. they will be. Of course it is possible to develop Pandora apps without a Pandora, as I'm sure many of us have done. Testing is problematic, but not impossible. But again just because you can prove that you can do these things for the community doesn't mean that you will when the time comes.
ED has done a sterling job, but obviously he can't continue doing what he has been doing. So perhaps there does need to be a way now of working out how best to move on from this.
Last edited by a moderator: