“flagrant violation of international copyright law”
Can't simplify it much more then that, but I'll try to connect the dots for the people that still don't get it.
I'm sure someone will argue why I'm wrong assessment, but to do so you have to avoid ignore the obvious truth of what I'm saying.
Why can't we all agree that GPH needs to release the source so this problem can go away?
Can't simplify it much more then that, but I'll try to connect the dots for the people that still don't get it.
- GPH is in “flagrant violation of international copyright law”
- The people who's copyrights have been violated will or are seeking a legal solution
- No amount of whining or bitching is going to change that.
- The copyright holders only seek compliance not punitive damages, however they will vigorously litigate if they must in order to get compliance.
- GPH does not have a legal “leg to stand on” nor do they have enough money to defend themselves and if this goes to court it is very likely GPH will be litigated to death.
- The only way GPH stays in business is if they come into compliance.
- If you don't want the GP2X to fail you must want GPH to release the source code.
I'm sure someone will argue why I'm wrong assessment, but to do so you have to avoid ignore the obvious truth of what I'm saying.
Why can't we all agree that GPH needs to release the source so this problem can go away?