calc84maniac
Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2009
- Messages
- 332
I think we knew this alreadyGC > CC
I think we knew this alreadyGC > CC
So far, the median is 956.5 MHz for the original CC Pandora, and 987 MHz for the Rebirth one.
Takedown: yes, it gets hot. That's not surprising with a cpu stress test. Mine reached temperatures above 40 degrees Celsius (while room temperature was around 20; it was also charging though). Nothing to worry about.
Updating the aggregated info:
- original (CC) Pandora: 778 (onpon4), 928 (TrashyMG), <936 (Linux-SWAT), 946 (Googer), 956 (PokeParadox), 957 (Fahrstuhl), 967 (Takedown), 969 (ZXDunny), 1006 (Ian J)
- Rebirth (GC) Pandora: 956 (apersonthinks), 985 or 989 (TrashyMG), 999 (_wb_)
- 1GHz Pandora: 1175, 1178 (foft), 1214 (kamui_kun)
So far, the median is 956.5 MHz for the original CC Pandora, and 987 MHz for the Rebirth one.
How do you get the OPP 3 and OPP 4 numbers? When I try the test, it always goes to OPP 5.
When you have such a little pool of data, you shouldn't use the median but rather the average
Updating the aggregated info:
- original (CC) Pandora: 778 (onpon4), 928 (TrashyMG), <936 (Linux-SWAT), 946 (Googer), 956 (PokeParadox), 957 (Fahrstuhl), 967 (Takedown), 969 (ZXDunny), 978 (lifning), 1006 (Ian J)
- Rebirth (GC) Pandora: 956 (apersonthinks), 985 or 989 (TrashyMG), 988 (ParadisoShlee), 999 (_wb_)
- 1GHz Pandora: 1166 (foft), 1214 (kamui_kun)
Original CC model average so far: 942 (based on 10 data points); if you remove the two extremes (onpon4 and Ian J), the average is 954.6; median=956.5
Rebirth GC model average so far: 982.5 (based on 4 data points); median=987.5
1GHz model average: 1190 (based on only 2 data points)
It looks like the average GC model is 30-40 MHz faster than the average CC model. The variation in the CC models seems to be larger: 228 MHz difference between slowest and fastest, while this difference is only 43 MHz for the GC models - but then again there is less data for the GC models.
CC 256MB Pandora here.
OPP5
I started at 950 based on my own previous experiences. It quickly reached 997 before starting a gradual decrease. After an hour or so it's now at 982Mhz. It was dropping every few minutes but seems to have settled here for the last 15 minutes or more. I'll give it another hour and then post my results.
you forgot to add mine.
at OPP5 it was over 1000, But I don't like going beyond that so I didn't experiment to find the exact value.
For medium activity use I find my Pandora is stable at 900 MHz at OPP3.
So my question is - How do I go about testing for OPP 3 and OPP 4? Should I, seeing as my unit froze at 845Mhz on OPP3, then set maximum allowed Mhz to 844 and test from there?
you forgot to add mine.
at OPP5 it was over 1000, But I don't like going beyond that so I didn't experiment to find the exact value.
For medium activity use I find my Pandora is stable at 900 MHz at OPP3.
Notaz' test first goes up, and then it goes back down. So it's quite possible that it goes over 1000 first, but then goes back down a lot (e.g. mine goes to 1050 or so before it finds the first error, but then in the more thorough testing, it still found an error at 1000). This is why I cannot include your number, because it's likely to be higher than the actual safe speed.