Ok. I didn't know there were numbers for that. Thanks.I think it was a study that I thought was fair and it stuck in my head. Can't find it at the moment though. But if you do not like the number, pick another:
CDC says at least 6 (so it can't be 4):
JHI says 27 (which is higher than 6, so yeah, why not):CDC Officially Concedes Natural Immunity Was Six Times Better Than Vaccine During Delta - DailyVeracity
A new CDC report which analyzed COVID outcome data from New York and California found that natural immunity…www.dailyveracity.com
This one says 13 (sound a bit low in my eyes):Johns Hopkins Doc Says Vaccine Mandates 'Ruin Lives' - And Natural Immunity Is 27 Times Better Than Jab
Maybe it's time for the Biden administration to set aside all of the politics and actually look at the science.www.westernjournal.com
Vaccination shouldn't damage your natural immunity if done right. It's kind of the opposite to what it's trying to do. In the case of COVID-19, it's possibly not done right because the circumstances forced the decisions, and lately because it's been used as a political tool.The important thing is that they do not seem to factor in the fact that vaccination damages your natural immunity (we don't know for how long yet)
But I'm not expert enough to tell.
I don't see the problem. It depends on what are you looking at. You seem to mean that recovered unvaccinated have immunity and the graph does not say the opposite, it just says those unvaccinated that never had COVID are more likely to get to hospital than those who are vaccinated, recovered or both. It doesn't claim there are a lot of unvaccinated who never had COVID, or that there'll be. It's more like you can look at what line you're in and see your chances based on what happened to others like you. But that's for Delta anyway.The blue continuous line for "Estimated hazard rate". That line represents less people, thus is statistically less important and therefore, another type of graph should be used. Else we can make a graph of people of the world v/s people from Yangsi and show that the latter group has 40% chance of dwarfism, versus rest of the world where the line is nigh zero. Everybody looks at the 40% and goes into panic mode.
I don't know their methodology.China's Dwarf Village - A Baffling Mystery
Yangsi, a remote village in China's Sichuan Province, is known as the Village of Dwarves. Around 40 percent of its population is under 80 cm tall, but no one can explain whywww.odditycentral.com
There are 2 ways:
1. Models (that could have had some bases in some initial numbers, usually a carefully selected subset, and they, say do a regression analysis and thus the model says, and you extrapolate for into the future.
2. Real data, real plots. (and as we know, there are always errors, unregistered things, etc.
It seems reasonable to say that a delta infection confurs better protection against another delta infection. But does an omicron infection protect you against a delta infection as well as a vaccination does? Who can say.
I don't know where I heard it. If I find any source I'll share it. Maybe I just misunderstood.I heard that omicron and delta are not mutually exclusive. you can test positive for both simultaneously so this suggests no cross immunity. but this could be due tests not really working so who knows.