Not able to use USB3.0 when in Hub-mode? Meh...
Me too.I very much like my barrel jack. Just wanted to have that for the record.
Me too.I very much like my barrel jack. Just wanted to have that for the record.
"DO A BARREL JACK!" ^_^I very much like my barrel jack. Just wanted to have that for the record.
Not sure if heat is really a separate problem -- charging the battery causes the battery to become hot, and the battery and SoC are not far away from one another...Heat obviously must be considered, but I think that is a separate problem. Is there any data whether the Pyra can even run at 100% without having to be throttled? I'm just saying that it would suck, to run low on power while using PCSX, plugging in the charger, pressing fast forward (just as an example, I know it probably wouldn't cause 100% load to both cores and the GPU), getting called away and finding a drained battery and corrupt fs 2 minutes later. I'd rather have the system throttled (if neccessary) but (at least slowly) charging.
Prototype of Pyra Charging Station/Hub revealed:You may be right I think it depends on whether charging is even possible while the Pyra is hot. I think the Pandora doesn't charge at all above a critical battery temperature. This temperature might be reached after some time of running the Pyra at 100%. In that case I'd like to be at least able to power the Pyra from the charger and not be forced to stop using it. If it can theoretically be charged while hot, I assume (wrongly?) that the heat geenerated by charging can be managed so that it is lower than the heat generated by draining the battery while the System is running at 100% power consumption.
Are you sure this is not possible using just µUSB? I'm imagining a µUSB charger that still allows you to plug in a USB3 device.In any case, I think the use case of wanting to be able to charge the unit while also using a SuperSpeed USB3 device is enough of a reason to include the barrel jack.
- Neelix
I think it's pretty clear. First one means "We absolutely need a barrel chack", second one "I want a barrel jack ", third one "I don't care" and the fourth and fifth the symmetric opposites to 2 and 1.Could this poll be redone with reasonable options in support of the Barrel jack please? The current wording is so biased towards leaving it out, that the results are meaningless.
- Neelix
Am I sure it's not possible... No.Are you sure this is not possible using just µUSB? I'm imagining a µUSB charger that still allows you to plug in a USB3 device.
I think it's pretty clear. First one means "We absolutely need a barrel chack", second one "I want a barrel jack ", third one "I don't care" and the fourth and fifth the symmetric opposites to 2 and 1.
That was noted in this very thread, only a few posts earlier: There is a technology which allows an USB host device to draw power from it's slave. We don't know whether the Pyra SoC supports this technology, though.Am I sure it's not possible... No. Do I have any confidence that such a device as you describe here will be more than your imagination? No.Are you sure this is not possible using just µUSB? I'm imagining a µUSB charger that still allows you to plug in a USB3 device.
I think this is the breaking question, really. There has been statements that "This ought to be possible" and "According to the spec, it is possible", but there has been no practical example, as in "Look at this charger thingy here - This makes it possible to do it". My preference for the barrel jack is more out of usability and trust (I like to be able to differentiate my data and power sources, and I know I have no problem getting barrel jack chargers in any combination of voltage and amperage), but the possibility that we might end up with a situation where Neelix use case (which is more or less where we want the Pyra to work, right?) fails because we cant supply enough juice is a bit scary.Are you sure this is not possible using just µUSB? I'm imagining a µUSB charger that still allows you to plug in a USB3 device.In any case, I think the use case of wanting to be able to charge the unit while also using a SuperSpeed USB3 device is enough of a reason to include the barrel jack.
- Neelix
How hard would this be?The catch would be having the logic sitting behind it to negotiate to the highest amperage that the source can provide. Up to 2.1A or such.
This is stupid because it takes even more room than a barrel jack. No one has anything against barrel jacks. It's just that if we only have room for a barrel jack OR a second USB host port, then the USB port is to be preferred.How hard would this be?The catch would be having the logic sitting behind it to negotiate to the highest amperage that the source can provide. Up to 2.1A or such.
Could it be done with a GPIO?
A tiny/cheap microcontroller?
Custom charge controller firmware?
The thing I don't like about barrel jacks is that there are so many sizes - and I have to go to a mega-big-box store or a Radio Shack to find one if I'm traveling and misplace my charger. They're invariably cheap affairs with a gigantic, heavy wall wart brick with blades/fangs that don't retract.This is stupid because it takes even more room than a barrel jack. No one has anything against barrel jacks. It's just that if we only have room for a barrel jack OR a second USB host port, then the USB port is to be preferred.How hard would this be?The catch would be having the logic sitting behind it to negotiate to the highest amperage that the source can provide. Up to 2.1A or such.
Could it be done with a GPIO?
A tiny/cheap microcontroller?
Custom charge controller firmware?