RANT ON
You know what's depressing ?
The fact that the thread about a pirated game get more reply than any other games (aka all the legal ones) ported to pandora.....
I agree, you know what's also depressing... from a game-play and game-dev standpoint this is actually a pretty bad game.
Let me explain, all this game is is polish, it got fancy art, nice catchy music and sound and a wonderfully funny setting. It just works, they did this really well I have got to admit.
Now the gameplay on the other hand it rather bland, repetitive and down-right bad. It's not a Angry Birds specific problem, it's actually a problem of all game of this kind and most physic-based games in general.
The point is, this game is solely about trial and error. You aim a shot you make it and you watch what happens, if it's good you make the next one, if not you start over, repeat.
There is NO learning curve, there is NO real interaction with the game, it's all just random stuff as those physics (as physics in real life) are highly chaotic and unstable.
Aiming the same shot twice (apart from being nearly impossible) will almost always lead to different results - you just can plan properly and because of that there is almost no strategy involved (also as the order in which the birds are shot is fixed) and it all boils down to simple trial-and-error. This becomes most apparent on the hidden (second?) golden egg level in which you have got to destroy three pyramids made of pigs.
Jonathan Blow actually made a very interesting prototype of a game with the same problem - you can download it
here and read about it
here.
Now they made thousands of levels, they actually created different types of birds, which I have to admit are all different and actually useful, but this does not change the fact that you will play level 100 in the same way as you played level 2.
It's fun, yes, but there are WAY better and WAY more meaningful games out there. There are also WAY more games out there with the same idea in mind, a quick fun for short breaks.
In comparison to Jason Rohrer's games I just ported I like to think of a comparison between a Kafka novel and one book of the Twilight series (with Angry Birds being the latter of course). The latter is just polished "glitter", is a total rip-off (with fans calling the other the clone - it probably also happened with Angry Birds) and has NO deep meaning (in the Twilight case even misguiding sub-text), NO redeeming value, yet is hugely popular on NO real justifiable basis apart from being appealing because of outside appearance and clever marketing.
So why is there so much interest in this compared to other games? Just because it's "polished" and nice looking? (you don't need to answer this)
That, I find depressing.
RANT OFF
(Insert obligatory "I don't want to live on this planet any more" joke)