Don't worry, its natural for - even 20 years later - Amiga people to hate ST people, vi people to hate Emacs people, and Apple people to hate Windows people. Such is life
(Well, everyone had their favourite, and the companies loved to compete and fan the flames of war
The truth is easy .. Amiga was a superior hardware platform in many (but not all) ways; ie: it cost more, which was a benefit and a detractor -- my family wouldnt' touch the costlier machine, so I got an ST instead
The ST was off the shelf parts with a few custom chips.. easy to repair and upgrade, and had MIDI to boot. Amiga was upgradable over time as cards came out, due to a PC-like modular design. Amiga had superior sound (the biggest advantage), and better graphics were achievable. (ie: ST could do 512 colours as well, though it took tricks. Course, Amiga couldnt' use half its modes without flickering like mad
One can go on and on, back and forth about which h/w was better .. the ST was better in some respects, and worse in many others. The real question is the software -- and for most of their lives they were even steven in this regards, with specialties. Amiga had better painting apps, while the ST had far superior publishing and graphics apps; they shared most of their games. The ST BBS scene was enormous for instance, while the Amiga wasn't so hot.
The Amiga was superior later, as the ST line started to dwindle for a lot of interesting reasons, and the Amiga managed to fight the PC onslaught a little longer and got a few more good years in.
Really, both parties are just bitter that the PC world took over instead; we should all, who use computers today, remember there was a day when different brands meant something .. and thankfully Apple has kept up the fight, and of course FreeBSD and Linux are doing their part.
jeff