And we just nuked 2 Japanese cities for no reason.
Indeed you did. Russian troops would have been there to finish off the last of Jap resistance in a mere six days, but that wouldn't have been good for America's image of world conqueror. Political wrestling at its best. You know that they wanted to nuke a third city, too, but by that time the Japs officially gave up and you eventually let that plan slide.
I can't say whether the Russians would have actually taken action, and if they'd have so easily 'finished off' Japan. At any rate, there's reason to believe the bombs saved lives. Their dramatic effect brought a rapid surrender when faced with a force the nation had never seen before-- there was immense resistance to what was expected, an invasion (one was planned by the US if Japan did not surrender.) There was an army of civilians guarding the shores, even young teenagers and the elderly.. with bamboo spears. There is no doubt it would have been a slaughter when an invasion took place-- American or Russian. The cost of lives from the 2 atomic bombs was arguably lower than it would have been if there were an invasion due to the conditioning by the Japanese government, telling them that the Americans were going to kill all civilian men, and rape all the women. There was a great deal of suicide prior to the bombings in anticipation of such an invasion, in fact. The government's statements were widely believed-- Emperor Hirahito had made claims that he ruled by divine right, a claim he withdrew shortly after the surrender. Bombing Japan was definitely not a move for pride or just a show of force, it had a decisive military role-- and it underwent significant consideration, it was not a rash tactic. And the goal was not to kill a lot of civilians-- it was to end the war. We dropped leaflets first warning civilians to leave the area, and there was a delay before the second bomb was dropped, along with a warning to surrender. Had it been just an attack to kill a lot of people, there would be no leaflets, no warnings, just lots of atomic bombs dropped. Also consider the targets, Hiroshima and Nagasaki-- of considerable importance to the military effort in Japan. If the goal were civilian casualties a city like Tokyo would have been a more suitable target-- such a target was not chosen.
Fawny Kate said:
Another reason America is resented is its constant posturing and propaganda surrounding its role in the second world war. You would think they were the only nation standing up to the Nazi evil. Unlike Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Britain who declared war within days of the invasion of Poland, America wandered into the fray only after war was declared on them.
I don't recall any official statement from the US claiming to have won the war singlehandedly. Nor any propaganda to suggest anything of the sort. We were following an isolationist policy until we were declared war upon, yes-- I don't approve of that, but these were different times and a lot of factors were involved. We were already clearly not neutral as we were providing war material to Britain.[/quote]
Fawny Kate said:
Up until then the likes of Bush's grand-daddy were too busy selling munitions to the Third Reich to be concerned with the Nazi invasions.
Wow, you actually believed that fairy tale? Do you believe 9/11 was an inside-job committed by Bush-and-Pals and the CIA too? Or that it's a big scheme for the Jews and the One World Nation and Zionist Conspiracy to take over the planet?
Alex. said:
Airman, you say? No wonder you're programming a shooter game
Did you have to pass those high-G tests?
A lot of other training, but not tests for tolerance to G-forces, since I do not personally pilot aircraft. Shooters have actually always been a passion of mine actually...